2023年考研英語真題英語一真題完整版

Dｉｒectiｏns:Reａdthefoｌｌowingteｘt.Ｃhｏosethｅbestｗoｒｄ（s)forｅachnumberedｂlａnkandmaｒkＡ,B,CｏrDｏｎA(yù)NSWERＳHEET.（１0pｏiｎts）Ｔhｏｕghｎotbiologicallｙrelａt(yī)ed,friendsａｒeaｓ“rｅlaｔｅd”asｆourthcousins,sｈaringaｂouｔ１%ofｇｅｎes.Thaｔis_(1)_astudy,pｕｂlisｈeｄfromtｈeUnivｅrｓityofCalｉforｎiaandYａleThestｕｄyisagenomｅ-wiｄｅanalysｉscoｎdｕcted_(3)__1，932uniquesｕbｊectsｗhich＿_（4）__pairｓofunrelａｔｅdfriendsaｎdunrelａt(yī)edstｒangｅｒｓ．Thesａｍepeopｌｅwereuseｄinboth_（5)_.Whilｅ1%mａyseem_(6)＿,itisnｏtsｏtoageｎeｔｉciｓt．AｓJameｓFｏｗlｅr,pｒｏfesｓorofmediｃalgｅnetｉcsatUCSanＤiego,ｓａys,“Mostpｅopleｄonｏｔｅven_(７)_ｔｈｅｉrfourthcousｉnｓｂｕtsomｅｈｏｗmａnagｅtoselectaｓfrieｎｄｓtｈｅpeｏpｌｅwho_（8)_ouｒｋin.”Ｔhestudy_(9)＿foundtｈattheｇeｎｅｓfoｒｓmelｌｗerｅsoｍetｈｉngsｈａrｅdinfriendsｂutnotgeｎesforimmｕnｉｔy．Whyｔｈissｉmilaｒiｔyeｘｉstsinｓｍｅllｇenesisdiffｉｃulｔtｏexplain，foｒnｏw,＿(10）＿,asthｅｔeaｍsuｇgests,ｉtdrawsuｓｔoｓimilarenvironmentｓbuｔthｅreismorｅ_(1１）_it．Ｔｈeｒｅcouldbｅｍａｎymechanismsworｋingｔｏｇethｅrtｈat＿(1２)_usinchoｏsinggeneticallｙsimilarｆｒiends_(1３）_”ｆｕnctiｏnaｌKinｓｈｉp”ofbeｉnｇｆriendsｗｉｔh＿(14)＿!Oneｏftherｅmarkablefindingsofｔhｅsｔudｙwasthesｉmiｌargenesｓeemｔoｂeｅvoｌuｔiｏｎ_（１5)_thａnｏtherｇenesＳtudyiｎｇthｉscoｕldhelp_(16）_whyhumanｅvolｕtｉｏｎｐicｋedｐacｅｉnｔhelａsｔ３０,00０years,withsocialenｖironmｅntｂｅｉｎgamajｏr＿(17)_facｔor.Thefiｎｄinｇsdｏnotｓimplyeｘpｌａiｎpｅopｌｅ’s_(18）_toｂｅfriendthｏｓeｏfsiｍilａr_(１９)_baｃkgｒounds，saytｈereseaｒｃhers.ThougｈallthesubjectsｗｅrｅｄｒaｗnfromapopulａｔiｏnｏｆＥuｒoｐeaｎextractiｏｎ,ｃａrewastakeｎｔo＿(２０)_thatallｓｕbjectｓ,ｆriendsａndstrａｎgers,weｒetａkenｆromtｈｅsaｍepｏpｕlaｔion.1.[A]whｅn[Ｂ]why[C]how[D]ｗhａt(yī)2.[A]dｅｆｅｎded［B]conclｕdeｄ[C]withdraｗn［D］advｉｓｅｄ3.［Ａ]ｆor[Ｂ]ｗith[C]on[D]ｂy４.[A]compaｒed［Ｂ]ｓougｈt[C]sepａrated[D]coｎnｅcted5.［A］teｓts[B]s[Ｃ]sampｌeｓ［D］eｘamｐleｓ6.［A]inｓｉgnifiｃaｎｔ[B]uｎexpecｔed[C]ｕnbelｉevable[Ｄ］incｒedible7.[A］visiｔ[Ｂ]ｍiｓｓ[C]ｓｅek[D]ｋｎow8．[Ａ］resembｌe［B]influｅncｅ[Ｃ]ｆavor［D]sｕrｐａss9.[A］agaiｎ［Ｂ]also［C]instead［Ｄ]thuｓ10.[A]Meanwhile[B］Furｔｈerｍｏre[C］Ｌiｋeｗｉsｅ［D]Ｐerhａpｓ1１.[A]about[B]ｔo[Ｃ]from［D]lｉｋe1２.[A]drivｅ[B］obsｅrve［C]confuse[Ｄ］limiｔ1３.[A]accｏｒdingｔｏ[B]rathｅrthａn［C］rｅgａrdlessof[D]ａlongwith１4.[A］cｈances[B]resｐonsｅs[C］missioｎs[Ｄ］benｅfｉts15.[A]later[B]slｏwer[C]fasteｒ[D］earlieｒ16.[A］forｅcaｓt[Ｂ]ｒｅmｅmber[C]ｕndｅrｓtand［Ｄ]exｐress17．[A］ｕnｐredicｔaｂｌe[B]cｏntrｉbutoｒy［C]ｃontrｏｌlablｅ［D]diｓｒｕptｉve18.[A］endｅａvor[B]deciｓiｏn［C]ａｒranｇeｍｅnt［D]tｅndｅnｃｙ１9.［A］ｐoｌitical[B]reｌigious[C]ｅthｎｉｃ[D］economiｃ２０.［Ａ]ｓｅｅ[B]show［C]ｐrove[D]teｌlSecｔionIIＲeadiｎgCｏmpｒehensionＰartADｉrecｔions:Readｔｈeｆｏllｏｗiｎｇfoｕrtexts.AｎsｗerthequestionsbｅｌｏweacｈteｘtbycｈooｓingA,Ｂ,CorＤ.MarkyｏｕransweｒsoｎA(yù)NSWERSＨEEＴ.(40points)Texｔ1ＫiｎgJuanCaｒlosｏfSpaｉｎoｎceinsisｔed“kinｇｓdon’tabｄicaｔe,theydareinｔｈeirsleｅｐ.”BｕtemｂａrrassiｎgscanｄalsandthepoｐuｌarityoｆtｈerepublicanlｅftinthｅｒecenｔＥuro-eｌecｔioｎshaveforcedhimtｏｅathｉsｗordｓandｓtanddoｗｎ.So，doestheSpanishcriｓiｓｓuggeｓtthａt(yī)moｎarchyiｓseeingitslastdayｓ？DｏestｈaｔmeanthewｒitingisonthewａｌlforallＥｕropeanｒoｙａls,wiｔhtheｉrmagｎｉｆiｃentunｉfoｒｍsanｄｍａjestｉclifestｙｌｅ？ThｅSpａniｓｈcaseｐｒovidｅsaｒgｕmentｓbothｆorandａｇaｉnsｔmｏnaｒchy．Wheｎpubｌicopiniｏｎｉspartｉcｕlarlyｐｏｌarised,aｓｉtwasfoｌlowiｎgｔheenｄoｆtheFranｃoｒｅgime,monarchｓcanriseａbovｅ“meｒe”pｏlitｉcsaｎd“ｅmbody”ａspiritoｆnatｉｏnａluｎｉty.Itｉｓtｈisapparｅnttraｎsｃenｄeｎceｏｆpoｌitｉcsthａｔexplainsmonarchs’coｎtiｎuｉngpopulariｔyｐoｌaｒized．Anｄalso,tｈｅＭｉddleＥastexcｅpｔed,Ｅuropeiｓthemｏstｍonaｒch-iｎfesteｄregiｏnintheworld,ｗitｈ10ｋiｎｇdoms(nｏｔcouｎtingVatiｃaｎCityandAnｄorｒa).ButｕnｌiketheirａbsolｕtistcｏuntｅrpａrtsinｔheGuｌfandAsia,ｍoｓtｒoyalfamilieshavesurvivedｂecauｓetheｙalｌowvoterｓtoａvｏidthediffｉcuｌtsｅaｒcｈfｏｒanoｎ-controversｉalbｕtresｐecｔedｐublicfｉguｒe.Eｖenso,kingsandqｕeeｎsundouｂｔedlyhaveaｄownsiｄｅ.Ｓｙmbolｉcofnatiｏｎalｕｎityａｓｔｈeyｃlａimｔobe,tｈｅｉrveｒyhistoｒy—andｓｏｍetiｍeｓthｅwａytheybｅhavｅtodａｙ–embodieｓouｔdａt(yī)edandindefensiblｅpｒｉvｉleｇｅｓａｎdineｑｕaｌｉtieｓ.Aｔａt(yī)imewheｎThomasPikeｔｔｙanｄｏthｅreｃｏnomｉstsａrewarｎｉｎgofrisinginｅqualｉtyanｄtheincrｅaｓingpoweroｆｉｎheritｅdwealtｈ,itisbiｚarrｅthatｗeaｌthyａristocraticfamilｉesshouldsｔｉlｌbethｅsymbolicheartofmoderndeｍocｒaticstaｔes.Ｔhｅmosｔｓuccesｓｆulmonａｒcｈiｅｓsｔrivｅtoabａndonorhｉｄethｅirｏldaristocｒａt(yī)icwayｓ.Princesandpｒｉncesseshavｅday-jobsandriｄebｉｃycles，nothｏrｓes(orhelｉcopｔeｒs).Ｅｖeｎso,thesearｅweａlthｙfamilieｓｗhopaｒtywiththeinterｎational１%，aｎdmediaｉntrｕｓiｖｅnessmakｅsitiｎcreａｓinglydifficulttomａintaintheｒiｇhtｉmａge．WhileEuropｅ’ｓｍｏｎarchｉeswilｌnodoubtbｅsｍａrｔｅnougｈtｏsuｒviveｆorsometiｍetｏcoｍe,itiｓｔheBrｉtｉshrｏyalswhoｈａvemｏsｔｔoｆeａrfｒomtheSpaniｓhexａmｐｌe.IｔｉsonlytｈeＱｕeｅｎｗhoｈaspreserveｄthｅmｏnarchy’sreｐutaｔiｏnwiｔhｈerratheｒordinaｒｙ（ifwelｌ-hｅｅled)ｇrａnnystｙｌe.TｈｅdａngerwilｌcomeｗiｔhＣharｌｅs,wｈｏhaｓbotｈａnexpeｎsiveｔasｔｅｏfliｆesｔyleanｄaprｅtｔyhieｒａrｃｈicａlviewofｔheｗorld．Hehaｓfａilｅｄtｏunｄerstanｄtｈaｔｍonarcｈieｓｈavelargelｙsurvivedｂecauｓetheyｐrovideaserviｃe–asnｏn-ｃｏnｔｒoｖｅｒsｉalandnon-ｐoｌiticａlheadsofstate.CｈaｒlesｏughttoknowｔhａｔaｓEnglishhｉstoryshｏws,itiskｉngs,noｔrepublicanｓ,wｈoarｅthemoｎａｒchｙ’ｓwoｒstenemies.21.AcｃｏｒdiｎgtothefirsttｗoＰarａｇraphｓ,KｉｎgJuanCarlosofＳpaiｎ[A]usｅdｔｕｒnenjoｙｈighpubliｃsuppｏrt[B]wasｕnｐopularamoｎgEｕｒｏｐｅａnｒｏyals[C]cａsedhisrelａt(yī)ｉonshipwitｈｈisrivaｌｓ[D]endedhｉsｒeignineｍｂａｒraｓsmｅnt２2.Monarcｈsarｅkepｔasheａｄsofstａt(yī)ｅiｎEuｒopeｍostly[Ａ]owinｇｔotheirｕndoubtedandreｓpectaｂleｓｔaｔuｓ[B]ｔoachieveabalancｅｂetweｅnｔradｉtiｏnandreａlｉty[C］togiveｖoｔerｍｏｒeｐuｂｌiｃfigurestolooｋｕpto[D]duetothｅirｅvｅrlasｔｉｎgｐoliｔicaｌembodiment23.Wｈicｈｏftheｆolｌoｗinｇisｓhｏwnｔobeodd,ａccorｄingtoPaｒaｇraｐｈ４?[Ａ]Ariｓtｏcrats’excessiｖerelｉaｎcｅoninhｅｒiｔedwealｔh[B]Thｅroleoｆthenoｂilｉtyｉnmodeｒｎdｅｍocｒaciｅs[C]Thｅｓiｍｐlｅｌiｆestｙｌｅoｆｔheａriｓｔocratｉcfaｍiliｅｓ[D］Tｈenｏbilｉty’sａｄhereｎcetoｔheirｐrivilegeｓ24.TheBritishroyals“haｖemosttｏfｅar”beｃａｕｓｅＣharles［Ａ］takeｓarougｈlｉneonpoliticalｉssｕeｓ[B]fａilstochaｎｇehislifestｙleasadviｓeｄ［C]ｔakesｒepｕbｌｉｃanｓashispoｔenｔialalliｅｓ[D]ｆａilstoadapthｉmsｅｌfｔohisｆutｕrｅrｏle2５.Ｗhicｈoｆthefollｏｗｉngistｈebestｔｉtleｏfｔheｔext?[Ａ］Ｃaｒlｏs，ＧｌｏryandDiｓgrａceCombiｎｅｄ[B]Charｌes,AnｘioｕsｔoSucceedtotｈｅTｈrｏnｅ[C]Cａrlｏs,aＬessonfoｒＡllＥuropeanMonarchs[D]Cｈａrleｓ,SlowtoReactｔothｅComｉngThreatsTEXＴ2JusthowmuｃhdoestheCoｎｓtiｔutｉonｐｒoｔeｃｔyｏurdiｇｉｔａldａt(yī)a?TｈｅＳｕpｒemｅCｐurtｗｉｌlnowconsiｄｅrwｈetheｒpolicecansｅarｃhｔhｅｃｏnｔentsoｆａmobilepｈｏnewｉｔhoｕtaｗａrｒａntifthｅｐｈonｅｉsonｏraroundaｐerｓoｎdｕrｉｎgaｎａrrest．Califoｒｎiaｈasaskedthejusｔiｃestorｅfrａｉnｆroｍａｓweepingrulｉｎg,pａrtｉculａrlyonethatupｓeｔstｈeoldaｓsｕmpｔioｎsｔhataｕthorｉtiｅsmaysearchthroughtheposｓesｓionsofｓｕspectｓatｔｈetimｅｏｆｔheirａrrest.Iｔiｓharｄ,ｔhesｔateaｒguｅｓ,forjｕdgestoａssesstheimpliｃaｔiｏnsofnewaｎdrａpｉdlｙｃhangiｎｇtechnologｉes.ThｅcouｒtwouldberｅcｋｌesｓlymodestifitfolｌowｅdCalifoｒnｉa’sadviｃe.Enoｕｇhoftheimplｉcａt(yī)ioｎsarediｓｃeｒnable，eｖeｎobvｉｏus,sothattheｊusｔicecａnandvidｅupdatedguｉdeｌｉｎesｔｏpolｉcｅ,ｌawｙeｒｓanｄdefenｄants.TheｙｓhoｕｌdｓｔartbyｄiscaｒdiｎgCaliｆorniａ’ｓlamearｇuｍentthａｔexpｌｏriｎｇtheｃonｔentｓｏｆasmarｔphｏne-ａvａstsｔoreｈoｕseofdigitaｌinforｍatiｏnｉssimｉlartosaｙ,goiｎgthrougｈaｓuspecｔ’spuｒｓe.Ｔheｃｏｕrthａｓruledｔhａt(yī)pｏliceｄｏn＇ｔviolatｅtｈeFourtｈAmendmentwｈentheygotｈｒoughtheｗaｌｌetorｐｏrcketboｏｋ,oｆanaｒresteeｗｉthoutaｗaｒrant.Butexplｏｒingone’ssmaｒｔpｈｏneｉsmorｅｌiｋeenteringhisoｒhｅｒhomｅ.Asmartphonｅmaycontainanarreｓteｅ’sｒeａdingｈiｓtorｙ，fｉnａnciａlhｉstory,ｍeｄicａｌhistoｒyａndcomｐｒehｅnsivｅｒecorｄsofrｅcenｔcｏｒresｐｏndｅncｅ.Ｔhedevelopmentof“cloudcｏmpuｔing.”meanwhile,hａsmadｅthatexplorationsomｕｃｈthｅeａｓiｅr．ＢuttｈejusticeｓshouldnｏｔsｗａlloｗCaliforniａ’sarｇuｍentwhole.Ｎew，disruptivetechnｏlogysometｉmesdemandｓnoｖｅlapｐｌicatiｏnｓoｆｔhｅConｓtiｔution’ｓprotｅctioｎs.OrinKeｒr,alaｗproｆｅssｏｒ，comparｅsｔheexｐloｓiｏｎａnｄacｃeｓsｉbilityofｄigitａrmationinthe21stｃenｔｕｒywiththｅeｓtablishmｅntofａuｔomobilｅuseaｓａdｉｇiｔalneceｓsiｔyoｆlｉfｅinthｅ２0th:Tｈeｊustｉcｅshadtospecifynoｖelrulｅｓfortheｎewpｅrｓｏnaｌdomainofｔｈｅｐassｅngｅrｃarthen;theyｍｕsｔsortouthｏwtheFｏurtｈAｍendmentaｐpｌiestodｉgｉｔａｌinformatiｏｎｎow.２6．TheＳuｐremｅｃourｔ,willworkoutwhether,duｒinｇａnarrｅｓt,itislegitimａt(yī)eto[A］sｅarchforsuspects’ｍｏbilepｈoneswithｏuｔaｗarrant．[Ｂ]ｃｈeckｓuspects’ｐhonｅｃｏｎｔenｔswｉｔhoutbeｉnｇauthｏrizｅd．[C］prevenｔsuspeｃtsｆrｏmdｅleｔｉngｔheiｒｐhｏｎeconteｎｔs.[D]proｈｉbitsuspｅcｔsｆroｍusｉngtheirｍobｉｌephones.27．Theaｕthｏr’sａｔtitudetowardCalifoｒｎia’sａrｇumeｎｔｉsoｎeoｆ[Ａ]toｌeｒance.[Ｂ］iｎdifferencｅ．[Ｃ]dｉｓapproval.[D]caｕtiｏusｎeｓs.28.Thｅautｈorbelieveｓｔhatexploｒｉngone’spｈoneconｔenｔiscｏmｐarableto[A]geｔtｉoone’sresidenｃe.[B］hａndｉngｏne’sｈｉsｔoricalrecords.[C]sｃannｉngonｅ’sｃorrespｏｎdences.［D］gｏinｇthrｏughone’swallet．２9.InParagraph5anｄ6，ｔheａuｔhorｓhowｓhiｓconcｅｒｎthat[A]princｉpｌesarehaｒdtｏbecleaｒlyexprｅssed.[B］theｃourtisｇivingpｏliｃelｅsｓroomforaction.[C]phonｅsａｒeuｓedｔｏｓtoresensitｉveinfｏrｍａｔiｏn.[Ｄ]ｃitizeｎs’pｒivａcｙｉｓnｏteffectｉｖtected．30.OrinＫerｒ’ｓcompariｓoniｓquoｔedtoｉndicatethａｔ（A)ｔｈeConstitｕtｉｏnｓhｏuldbeimｐｌｅmｅnｔedfｌexibly.（B)NeｗｔeｃhnologｙrequiresreinterpretationoｆｔheCｏnstｉtｕtion.(C)Caｌｉforｎia’sａrgumenｔｖｉolatｅsｐrincipleｓoftheＣｏｎsｔｉtution.(D)ＰｒinｃipleｓoｆthｅCｏｎｓtitｕｔionshouｌdneverbeａlteｒeｄ.Ｔeｘｔ３TｈejouｒｎalScienceisaddｉｎganextrａｒｏuｎdofsｔatistｉｃalcheckstoiｔspeeｒ-reviewｐroceｓs,eｄｉtｏｒ-in-ｃhｉｅfMaｒｃiaMcＮuｔｔannounceｄtodaｙ．Ｔｈｅpoliｃｙfollｏｗssimilａreｆｆortｓｆｒoｍotｈerjournals,ａｆtｅrwｉｄｅsｐｒeａｄcoｎcｅrnthatbasicmiｓｔaｋesiｎdatａａnａlｙsisarｅｃontributingtoｔheｉrreproducibiliｔyoｆmａｎypubｌishedreseaｒcｈfindings.“Readeｒsmustｈavecoｎｆidenｃｅintheconclusｉｏnsｐublishｅdｉnourｊｏuｒnａｌ，”ｗriteｓMcNｕｔｔinaｎeｄiｔoｒiａl.WorkinｇｗiththeAmeriｃanＳtａt(yī)isticaｌAｓsｏcｉatiｏn,ｔhejouｒｎalｈａｓappｏｉｎtedsevenexｐerｔstoastａt(yī)isticsboaｒｄofrｅvieｗｉngeditoｒs(SＢoRＥ）.Manuwiｌlbｅflaggｅduｐfoｒadｄｉtｉonａｌｓｃｒutｉｎｙｂytｈejournａl’sinterｎaｌeｄｉtoｒs,ｏrｂyitsexｉstinｇBoardofRｅvieｗｉngEditorsorbyoutｓｉdepeｅrreviewers．TheSBoREpanelwillthｅnfｉｎdexｔｅrnalsｔatｉｓtiｃiaｎstorevieｗtheｓemanuｓ.Ａskｅdwhｅtheranypaｒticularｐapｅrshadimpelｌｅdｔｈｅcｈａnge，ＭcNuttsaｉd:“Theｃｒeatioｎｏfｔｈｅ‘ｓtａt(yī)istｉcsboａrｄ’ｗasｍotｉvateｄbｙconcernsbrｏadlywｉththeapplicatｉonoｆstatisｔiｃｓaｎddatａanalyｓisiｎscieｎtiｆicｒesｅarcｈandｉspartｏｆScｉence’sovｅrａｌldriｖeｔoｉｎｃreasｅreｐroｄucｉbilｉtyｉntheresｅarcｈweｐuｂlish.”ＧiovａｎｎｉPaｒmｉgiani,ａｂiosｔatisticiａnattheHarvardSchoolofPｕｂlｉcＨealｔh，ameｍbｅｒoftｈeSBoREgroup,saｙｓｈeｅxpeｃtｓthebｏardto“pｌayｐrimaｒiｌyanadvisｏryrｏｌｅ．”Heagrｅｅdtojｏｉnbｅcausehe“ｆoundtｈｅfoｒesigｈｔbｅhinｄtheeｓtablｉｓhmentofｔhｅSＢoRＥｔoｂenoｖel,uniｑｕｅａnｄlikｅｌｙtｏhavｅａｌasｔinｇｉmpact.TｈisiｍpacｔwｉｌlnoｔonlybeｔhroughtheｐuｂlｉｃaｔioｎsinScienceiｔself,buｔhopｅfullｙthroughalargeｒｇroｕpofpubｌisｈｉngplacesthaｔmaywａｎｔtomoｄeltｈeirapproachafterSｃｉence.”31、IｔcanｂelearnedｆｒoｍParａgｒapｈItｈat［A］Scienｃeｉｎtｅｎｄstosiｍpｌifyｉtspｅer-reｖieｗprocｅss.[B］jourｎａlsａreｓtrengｔhenｉngtheirstａt(yī)ｉstiｃalcheｃｋs.[Ｃ]ｆewjouｒｎaｌsarebｌaｍedｆｏrmistａkｅsinｄataaｎalｙsｉｓ.[D]ｌackofdａt(yī)aａｎalｙｓｉsmoniｎresｅａrｃhｐrｏjectｓ.３2、Thephrase“flaggｅdｕp”(Pａrａ.2）isｔhｅｃｌｏsｅｓtinmeanｉｎgto［A]ｆoｕnd．[B]reviｓeｄ.[C］ｍａｒked[D]ｓｔｏred３３、ＧiｏvａnniParmiｇianｉbeｌieｖeｓｔｈattheestablisｈmeｎtoftheSＢoＲEｍay[Ａ］ｐｏseathreａt(yī)toａllitspeｅrs［Ｂ]meetｗithｓtronｇopposiｔiｏn[C]ｉnｃreaｓeSciｅnce’scｉrｃuｌation.［D]seｔanexampleforｏtherｊournａls34、DaviｄVａuxholｄsthatｗhatSｃieｎｃｅｉｓdoingnoｗA.addstoｒｅｓeaｒｃhers’ｗorklosｄ.Ｂ.ｄｉminisheｓｔｈeｒoleofreｖiewｅｒs．C.hａsｒoomfｏｒfurtherimproveｍeｎｔ．D.iｓtｏfailｉntｈｅforeｓeeablefuture．3５.Whｉchｏfｔhｅfolｌowinｇiｓthｅbesttitleｏftheteｘt?A．SｃieｎceＪoinsPuｓｈｔoScｒeenStatistiｃsｉnPaｐｅｒsＢ.ＰrofessionaｌStaｔisｔｉcianｓDeserveMoreＲespectC.DatａＡｎaｌｙsisＦiｎｄsIｔｓWayoｎtoＥdｉtorｓ’ＤeｓksD.SｔatistiｃｉansAreCominｇBackwitｈＳcienceTｅｘｔ4Ｔwoyｅaｒsaｇo，RupertMurdoｃh’sdauｇｈteｒ，Elisabｅtｈ,spｏkeofthe“unsettlingdｅarthｏfiｎtegｒｉtｙaｃrｏｓsｓomanyofｏuｒinｓtitutｉonｓ”Integrｉtyhaｄcｏllaｐsed,sheargｕed,becaｕseofacollectiveaccｅptancethattheｏnly“ｓｏrtiｎgmechanism”ｉnsocietysｈoulｄbeprofitaｎdthｅmarket.But“it’suｓ，humanbｅings，wｅｔhｅpeoplewhocrｅaｔｅｔhesocietywewａnｔ,ｎotprofiｔ”.Driviｎｇherpｏinthome,shｅcｏｎｔinuｅd:“It’sｉncreasinglyapｐarentthattｈeａbｓeｎcｅofpurpose，ofａmoｒallａｎgｕageｗithingｏvernment,mｅdiaｏrbusiｎesscｏｕldbｅcomｅoneｏfthemostdａngerousfoalｓfoｒcapｉtalｉsｍａndｆｒeedom.”ThissamｅabsenceofｍoｒalｐurpｏseｗａｓwoｕｎdingcompaｎiessuｃhａsNewsInternaｔｉoｎaｌ,shieldthoｕght,ｍａkingiｔmoｒｅｌｉkelythatｉｔwｏｕlｄloseｉtsｗayasithａｄwｉｔhwideｓpreaｄilｌegaltelephonｅhａcking.Aｓtheｈackｉngｔrialｃoｎcludes–findingｇuiltｙones-editｏｒｏｆtｈeNewｓoftｈeWorld,ＡnｄyＣoｕlson,forｃonsｐiｒingtohackphonｅs,anｄfindingｈisｐreｄeｃessｏr，ＲeｂekahBrｏｏks，inｎｏcentoftheｓaｍｅｃharge–tｈeｗiｎdｅrissueofdearthofintegｒitｙｓtiｌlstanｄstill，Journaｌiｓtｓarｅｋnowntohaｖeｈacｋedtheｐhｏnesｏfｕｐtｏ5,500peoｐle．Tｈisishａckingoｎaninｄustrialscaｌｅ，aswaｓaｃknoｗledgedbyGlennMｕｌcaire,thｅmａnhiredbytheNｅwsｏftheＷｏrlｄin20２3tobeｔhｅpointｐersｏnfｏｒｐhonehackｉng.Othersaｗａittｒiaｌ.Ｔｈiｓlｏngsｔｏrystilluｎfoｌds．Ｉnｍａｎyreｓpects,theｄeａrtｈoｆｍｏralpurposeｆrａmesnｏtonlythefaｃｔoｆsuchwidesprｅadphonehaｃkｉngbuttheteｒｍｓonwhichthetrｉaltookplacｅ.OneoftheastonｉｓhiｎｇrevelationswａsｈoｗlittleRｅbｅkahBrooksknewｏfｗhａt(yī)wentonｉnhｅｒnewsrooｍ,woｗlittｌeｓｈｅtｈoｕｇhttｏａsｋandthefactthatｓheneｖｅrｉnquiredwoｗtheｓtoriesarrived.Ｔhecoreoｆhｅrsuccｅssfuldefｅnceｗａsthａt(yī)sｈｅｋｎｅwnothing.Iｎtｏday’sworld,titlｅｈasｂecomeｎormａｌthａｔwelｌ—ｐaidexecuｔivesshoｕldnotbeaccｏuｎtａblefoｒwｈaｔhappeｎsｉnｔｈｅoｒｇａnizationstｈatthｅyrunperｈａpｓwesｈouldnotｂｅsosurｐrｉsｅd.Fｏrａgenｅratioｎ，thｅcolｌeｃtivｅｄｏcｔｒinehaｓbeｅｎｔhａt(yī)tｈesｏrtingｍｅchanｉsｍofsoｃｉetyｓhoulｄbeprofｉt.Thewordsthathavｅmatteredaｒeeffiｃiency,flexibilｉｔy,sｈarｅholdｅrｖalue,business–ｆriendly,ｗealｔhgeｎeraｔiｏｎ,sales，impaｃtand,inｎeｗspaｐers,ｃirculatioｎ.Wｏrｄsdegradeｄtoｔhemaｒginhaｖｅbeeｎjusticｅfａirnｅss,toｌeranｃe,ｐrｏportiｏｎalｉｔｙanｄaccoｕnｔａｂｉｌity.ThepｕｒposeoｆeditｉｎgｔheＮewsoftheWｏｒldｗasnottoprｏｍotereadeｒunｄerstandiｎgtｏbｅfairinwｈatwaswritｔenortｏｂeｔｒayanyｃommonhｕmaｎiｔy.Itwａsｔｏruinliｖesiｎtheqｕesｔfoｒcirｃulatｉonａｎｄｉmｐact.ＭｓBrｏokｓmａyｏrmaynｏthavehadsusｐicｉonsabouthowheｒjｏｕｒnaｌistsｇottheirｓtｏriｅs,butsheaｓｋednoｑｕｅsｔｉons,ｇａvｅnoiｎｓｔructiｏｎs—norrecｅivedtrａｃｅabｌe，ｒeｃorｄｅdansｗers.36.Ａｃcordiｎgtoｔhｅfirsttwoparagｒaphs，Ｅlｉｓabｅthwaｓｕpsｅtby[A]theconｓeqｕｅｎｃesofthｅｃurrentｓｏrtiｎｇmｅｃhaｎiｓm[B]ｃompａｎies’fｉｎaｎcialloｓsｄｕeｔoimmｏraｌpractices.[C]goｖernｍｅｎｔａlｉｎeｆfectｉｖenｅssonmoraｌｉｓsues．［D]tｈｅwidemiｓｕsｅofintegrｉtyamｏnginstitｕｔionｓ.37.ItcａnbeｉnferreｄfrｏｍＰaｒaｇraｐh3ｔhat[A]GlemMulｃairemａｙdeｎｙphｏnehａckinｇasａcriｍe[B]morejourｎaliｓtｓmａyｂefoundｇｕilｔyｏfｐhonehackｉnｇ.［C]AndyＣoulsoｎshouｌdｂｅｈeｌdinｎoceｎtoｆthecharge.[Ｄ］ｐhｏnehacｋiｎgwiｌｌbｅacceptedonceｒtainoｃcasiｏｎｓ．３8.TｈeaｕthoｒbeliｅvestheＲebeｋaｈBoｏｋs’ｓdｅfereｎｃe[A］revealedacunningｐeｒsonａｌitｙ[B]ｃenterｅｄｏntrivｉalｉsｓues[C]waｓｈaｒdlyｃonvｉｎcｉng[Ｄ］waｓpartofａｃonspiracy３9.Ｔheautｈoｒhoｌdｓthatthｅcurrentcｏllectivedoctｒineｓhows［A]ｇeneraｌlydｉstoｒteｄｖalｕeｓ［B]unfａirwealｔhdｉstｒibuｔion[Ｃ]aｍargｉｎaliｚeｄｌifeｓtyle[D]arｉｇｉdｍoｒａｌcｏte40.Whicｈｏftｈeｆoｌlowｉｎgｉｓｓuggｅstｅｄinｔｈｅlａstparagraｐh？[Ａ]Ｔｈequａｌityｏfwｒiｔｉngiｓｏｆpｒimarｙiｍportance.［B]Commonｈｕmａnityiscentｒalnewsrepoｒｔｉng.[C]Moraｌawarenessmattｅｒsｉnexcitinｇaｎeｗsｐaper.[D］Joｕrnａlｉstｓneedｓtｒicｔｅｒｉndustriａｌrｅｇulatｉonｓ.PartBDireｃtionsIntｈｅfoｌlｏwingtext,soｍesｅntencｅshaｖebeenｒｅmｏved.FｏrQuestｉｏnｓ41－4５，ｃhoosethｅmoｓtsｕｉtablｅonｅfromthelistA-Gtofitiｎtoeａｃhｏfnｕmbｅredbｌａnkｓ.Tｈerｅaｒetwｏextrachoices,whichdｏｎｏtfitiｎａnｙoｆｔheblａnks．MarkyouｒaｎswｅｒsonＡNSWERSHEＥT.(10pｏints)Howdoesyouｒｒｅadｉｎgproceed？Ｃlearｌyyoutrytocｏmpreheｎd,inｔhesｅｎｓeoｆidentifyingｍeaｎｉngsforindiｖiduaｌworｄｓａndworkingoutrelatiｏnｓhiｐsｂetweenthemｄｒaｗingoｎyour

iｍｐｌicitknｏwｌedgeoｆEnglｉｓｈgrａｍmar.(41)___＿__＿_Yｏｕbegｉnｔｏinferaconｔeｘtfｏrtｈeｔexｔ,fｏrinstａｎce,bymａkingdｅｃisｉonsabout

whatkｉndofspｅecｈeｖentisinvolved．Ｗｈｏｉsmakｉｎgｔhｅuｔｔeraｎce,ｔowhom，wｈenaｎdwheｒe.Thewaｙsofreadinｇiｎｄiｃａt(yī)edhereaｒｅwｉtｈoutdｏｕbtkiｎdsofcoｍｐrｅheｎsion.Ｂuttｈeｙshowｃoｍprehｅnsiｏnｔｏconｓｉsｔnoｔｊustｏｆpassiｖeassiｍilaｔiｏｎbutoｆactiｖeengagｅmeｎtｉｎ

iｎferｅnceaｎｄprobｌem－ｓｏlvｉng．Youｉnfｅｒinforｍationｙｏｕfeｅlthewriteｒhasinviｔｅdyoｕtogｒasｐbyｐrｅseｎtｉngyouwithsｐｅｃificeviｄencｅａndclues.（42)_________Ｃｏnceｉvedinthisway,coｍprehensｉｏnwillnotfollowexａctｌythesａｍｅtraｃkforｅａchreadｅr.Whａt(yī)iｓinquｅsｔiｏnisｎｏtthereｔｒiｅvａｌｏfaｎaｂsolute,ｆiｘedoｒ"true"meaningthatcanbereaｄoffａndcｈｅcｋeｄforacｃｕracｙ,orsｏmetｉmeｌessrelatioｎofｔextｔotｈewoｒlｄ.(43)_＿___＿＿__Suｃｈbacｋgrounｄｍaｔeｒｉalinevｉtablyrｅflecｔｓwhowｅａｒe.(４4)＿＿___＿_Tｈｉsｄｏｅsn｀t,hｏｗeveｒ，makeｉnｔｅrpｒetationmeｒelyreｌａt(yī)iveorｅｖeｎpointlｅss.Precｉseｌｙbecausereａdersfromdiｆferentｈiｓｔｏricａlperiods，ｐlａcｅsandｓocialeｘpｅrienｃesｐroducｅｄiｆferenｔbutｏvｅrｌａppｉnｇreadiｎｇｓoｆthesamewoｒdsｏntheiｎcludiｎgfoｒｔexｔstｈateｎｇａgewｉtｈｆuｎdaｍentａlhumａnconcerｎs--ｄebaｔeｓａboutteｘtscａnｐlayａnｉmporｔantroleinsocｉaｌｄiscｕssｉonoｆbｅｌｉefｓaｎdvalues．Howwｅｒｅadagiventeｘｔａlsoｄependｓtｏｓomeeｘtentonoｕrpａrｔicuｌａrinteｒestｉnrｅａdingｉｔ，(45)________Ｓucｈdimensioｎsofreａdｉngｓｕｇgest－asｏthersintrｏdｕcedｌatｅｒinthebookwiｌlalsｏdo-tｈaｔweｂrinｇａnｉmpｌiｃit(oftenuｎacｋnowledged）ａgenｄatoanyactｏfreadinｇ.Iｔdoｅｓn`ｔthｅnnecｅssａrｉlyｆｏｌlowthａt(yī)onｅkiｎdｏfrｅadinｇisfuｌｌer,morｅaｄvanceｄormｏreworthwhiｌeｔhananother.Ideaｌly，differeｎｔｍindｓoｆrmｅachother,ａndactasusefulｒｅｆerencepointsforandcouｎｔerｂａｌａｎcestooneanoｔher.Togetｈｅr,tｈeymakeｕpthereadingｃomｐoneｎtofyouｒoveraｌｌliterａcy，orｒelatｉonｓhiｐtoyoursｕrｒoｕｎｄinｇtｅxtｕalｅnvironmenｔ．[A]Arewestｕdyｉｎｇtｈattｅxｔandｔｒyingｔｏｒｅｓpondinaｗayｔhａt(yī)fｕｌfilｌstheｒeｑuireｍentofagivｅncourse?Ｒeadｉｎgitsimplyｆorｐleasure?Ｓkimmingｉtrmａt(yī)iｏｎ?Ｗaysofｒｅadｉngｏnａｔｒａiｎorｉnｂedaｒeｌｉkelｙtｏｄifferｃonｓideｒaｂlyfromreａdinginａsemiｎarｒoｏm.[B］Ｆactorｓsuchastheｐlａｃeandpｅｒiｏｄｉnwhiｃhｗeaｒeｒｅaｄing，ourｇender，ethｎiｃｉty,aｇeaｎdsocｉalclassｗillenｃourageuｓtowardｓcｅrtaininterprｅｔaｔionsbｕｔatthｅｓamｅｔｉｍeｏｂscurｅｏrｅveｎcｌosｅoffoｔhers.[C]Ifyouunfamｉｌiａrwｉｔｈwoｒｄsoriｄiｏms，yougueｓsattheirmeaniｎg，usinｇclueｓpｒesｅｎtedintｈｅcontｅxｔ.Ontｈeasｓｕmpｔionthaｔｔhｅｙwiｌlｂecomerｅlｅvantlａｔer，youmakeamｅｎｔａlnoｔｅofｄｉscourseentiｔiesaｓwｅllａsｐｏssibｌｅliｎksbetweｅntｈem.[Ｄ]Inｅffect,youtryｔoreconstｒucｔtheｌikｅlymeaningsoreffecｔsthatａnygiｖensｅntence,imageoｒrｅfｅrenceｍiｇhthaｖehad:Ｔheｓeｍigｈtbeｔheonesthｅａｅndｅd.[Ｅ］Ｙouｍａｋeｆｕrtｈｅrｉｎferencesthatｆｏrmtｈebasiｓｏfapersonalｒesｐonsefｏrwhiｃhtｈeauthorwillinevitａｂlybefarlesｓresｐonsible.ＳｅctionIIIＴｒanslａt(yī)ｉoｎDirｅcｔions:RｅadthefollowｉngtｅｘtcarefulｌyaｎｄtｈeｎtrａnsｌaｔｅtｈeunderlｉneｄsegmenｔsintoChｉｎeｓe.YourtranｓlatioｎshouｌdbｅwritteｎcleａrlyonAＮＳWEＲSHEET．(10ｐoｉｎts)Ｗｉｔhinthesｐanoｆahuｎｄrｅdyears,intｈｅｓeｖｅntｅenｔｈaｎdeａrｌyeｉghteenthcｅｎturies,ａt(yī)ideｏｆemiｇｒaｔion—onｅofthｅgｒeatｆolkwａndeｒinｇsofhiｓtory—ｓwepｔfromEurｏpetoAmerica.46）Thiｓmｏｖｅｍent,drivｅnbypｏｗerfulandｄiverseｍotivａt(yī)ioｎs,buiｌtanaｔionoｕｔoｆawilｄernｅssand,byｉｔsｎature,shapedthｅcharaｃtｅrａnddestinyｏfaｎuncharteｄcontinｅnt.４7)ＴｈeＵnｉtedStatesｉstheｐｒoducｔoftwoprｉnciｐalｆorces-ｔheimｍｉgratｉonofEurｏｐeanｐeopleswiｔｈthｅiｒvａrieｄideａs,customs，andnaｔｉonaｌcｈaracteristｉcsaｎdtheｉｍpactｏfanewcountｒywｈｉchmodifiedｔｈesetｒaｉts.Ｏfnｅcｅssｉｔｙ,coloniａlAmｅｒicawasaｐｒojecｔｉｏnofEurｏpｅ.ＡｃrossthｅAtｌａntｉccameｓuccessivｅｇroupsofEngｌisｈmeｎ,Frenchｍen,Ｇermanｓ，Scotｓ,Irｉｓhmen,Dutcｈmen,Ｓwｅdes,andmａnｙｏｔherswhｏaｔtｅmptedtotranｓｐlanttheirhabitsandtrａdition