新型冠狀疫情有關(guān)閱讀理解練習(xí)_第1頁
新型冠狀疫情有關(guān)閱讀理解練習(xí)_第2頁
新型冠狀疫情有關(guān)閱讀理解練習(xí)_第3頁
新型冠狀疫情有關(guān)閱讀理解練習(xí)_第4頁
新型冠狀疫情有關(guān)閱讀理解練習(xí)_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩6頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

疫情有關(guān)閱讀理解練習(xí)ADuringtheongoingbattleagainstthenovelcoronaviruspneumonia(NCP),youmayhavereadnewsthatgarlicandsesameoilcanquicklykillthevirusbutitprovedtobemisinformation.WhilethenationcontinuestofightagainsttheNCP,it’salsosteppingupeffortstofightthespreadofmisinformation.Intheinternetera,thenatureofhowinformationspreadshastransformeddrastically(巨大地).Information-andmisinformation-canspreadtothousandsofhouseholdsinseconds.Formostpeople,fact-checkingisanafterthought-ifitisathoughtatall.Therefore,misinformationthrives(滋生蔓延),saidTheWashingtonPost.Peoplesimplypreferpassingoninformationthatwillevoke(引起)anemotionalresponsefromreaders.Whetherornotitisfactualisnotalwaysthetopcriterion,especiallyintimesofpubliccrisis.Misinformationcouldbeagreaterdangerthanthevirusitself.Misinformationis“makingtheworkofourheroicworkersevenharder”,WorldHealthOrganization(WHO)DirectorGeneralTedrosAdhanomGhebreyesustoldChinaDaily.Hesaidmisinformation“causesconfusionandspreadsfear”.DuringthefightagainsttheNCP,Ghebreyesussaidthat“attheWHOwe’renotjustbattlingthevirus,we’realsobattling...conspiracy(陰謀)theoriesthatundermineourresponse.”ItistruethatasChinaracestocontaintheNCPandminimize(減少到最低限度)itsspreadacrossborders,fearandrumors(謠言)surroundingthevirusarecreatingtheirownproblemsonsocialmedia.“Ironically(諷刺地),speedisimportantonthosethings,”USprofessorGabrielKahntoldTheLosAngelesTimes.“But…thosearetheonesyouhavetobemostcertainaboutverifying(驗(yàn)證)beforeyoushare.”Asordinarypeople,wemaynotbeabletodevoteourselveslikethosemedicalstaff.Butwecouldthinktwiceaboutwhatweread.Ifyoucanbecarefulaboutsharinginformation,it'syourcontributiontothefightagainsttheoutbreak.Accordingtothearticle,whatisthemaincauseforthespreadofmisinformation?Thelackoffact-checking.Theriseofpubliccrises.People’sdesiretotrickothers.Changesinthewaypeopleviewinformation.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“undermine”probablymean?A.testB.harmC.guideD.explainWhatproblemhasbeenfoundduringthebattleagainsttheNCP?Peoplehavefearscausedbymisinformation.Itishardtodealwithmisinformationacrossborders.Rumorsaboutthevirustraveltoofasttobecontrolled.Socialmediacreatesproblemsforpeopletoverifymisinformation.Whatistheauthor’spurposeinwritingthearticle?Tosharetipsonhowtofightmisinformation.TodisprovesomemisinformationabouttheNCP.Tocallonpeopletowatchoutformisinformation.TotellwhatChinahasdonetodealwithmisinformation.SinceDecember,therehavebeentensofthousandsofCOVID-19casesbothinandoutofChina,causedbyapreviouslyunknownvirus:novelcoronavirus.It’snotthefirsttimeforvirusestomakeheadlines.Viruseshavebroughtbigtroubletohumans,withtheirpotentialtocausewidespreaddiseaseanddeath.Whatarethey?Virusesareconsideredtobenon-livingorganisms(有機(jī)物).Theycaninfectanimalsandplants,makingthemsick.TheycontaingeneticmaterialslikeDNAandareprotectedbyacoatingofprotein.Unlikebacteria,virusescan'treproduce(繁殖)ontheirown.Instead,theyinvadedthecellsoflivingorganismstoreproduce,spreadandtakeover.Butthebasicquestionis,wheredidvirusesfirstcomefrom?Untilnow,noclearexplanationfortheiroriginexists.“Tracingtheoriginsofvirusesisdifficult,”EdRybicki,avirologistattheuniversityofCapeTowninSouthAfrica,toldScientificAmerican,“becausevirusesdon'tleavefossils(化石)andbecauseofthetrickstheyusetomakecopiesofthemselveswithinthecellsthey'veinvaded.”Understandingtheoriginsofvirusesmeansfullyunderstandingthehistoryoftheirhosts-notonlyhumans,butalsobacteria,plantsandotheranimals,whichisacomplicatedtask,saysNature.However,therearethreemaintheories(推測)toexplaintheoriginofviruses.First,virusesstartedasindependentorganisms,thenbecameparasites(寄生者).Second,virusesevolvedfrompiecesofDNA(脫氧核糖核酸)orRNA核糖核酸)that“escaped”fromlargerorganisms.Thethirdoneisthatvirusesco-evolvedwiththeirhostcells,whichmeanstheyexistedalongsidethesecells.8Forthetimebeing,theseareonlytheories.Thetechnologyandproofswehavetodaycannotbeusedtotestthesetheoriesanddiscoverthemostplausibleexplanation.Continuingstudiesmayprovideuswithcleareranswers.Orfuturestudiesmayfindthattheanswerisevenmoremysteriousthanitnowappears.Whatcanwelearnaboutvirusesfromthearticle?Theymainlyinfectanimalsandplants.Theyarereallysmalllivingorganisms.Theyaremoredangerousthanbacteria.Theycan’treproduceunlesstheyfindahostcell.Whichofthefollowingmightexplaintheoriginofviruses?Theyevolvedalongwiththeirhostcells.TheyevolvedfromtheDNAorRNAinanimals.Theyevolvedfromthefossilsoflargeorganisms.Theyevolvedfromparasitestoindependentorganisms.Theunderlinedword“plausible”inthelastparagraphprobablymeans“”.A.creativeB.reasonableC.commonD.unbelievableWhatdoweconcludefromthearticle?Viruseslivelongerinhumanhostcellsthaninanimals.Viruseswillbecomemorelikebacteriaastheyevolve.Itmaytakealongtimetounderstandtheoriginofviruses.Theauthorisconfidentaboutfuturevirusresearch.CThesuddenriseofthenewcoronavirus(冠狀病毒)hasshockedChina.AlthoughChinahasbeendoingeverythingpossibletostopthevirus,ithasspreadoutsideofitsbordersandintootherregions.Therearenowconfirmedcases確診病例)ofCOVID-19incountriesincludingtheUK,Japan,Germany,Vietnam,RussiaandtheUnitedStates.Thereisagrowingfearthattheeffectsoftheoutbreak疫情爆發(fā))willworsenifitisnotcontained.ThishasledtocountriesclosingborderswithChinaandputtingtravelbans(禁令)inplace,hopingtoprotecttheirowncitizens.However,fearandmisinformation(不實(shí)消息)havealsocausedthespreadofsomethingelse-racism(種族歧視).RestaurantsandbusinessesinmanytouristareasacrosstheworldhavepostedsignsbanningChinesepeople.SocialmediausersrecentlysharedapictureofasignoutsideahotelinRome,Italy.Thesignsaidthat“allpeoplecomingfromChina”were“notallowed”inthehotel.Similarsignswithanti-Chinesesentiment(情緒)werealsoreportedlyseeninSouthKorea,theUK,MalaysiaandCanada.Thesesignswereloudandclear-“NoChinese”.Racistactionssuchasthesedoalotmoreharmthangood.“Myethnicity(種族淵源)hasmademefeellikeIwaspartofathreateninganddiseasedmass(群體):SamPhan,amaster’sstudentattheUniversityofManchester,wrotetotheGuardian.EdithBracho-Sanchez,anassistantprofessoratColumbiaUniversityIrvingMedicalCenter,hasexperienceworkingonhealthissuesthatinvolve涉及)internationalborders.2.“Ashumanbeings,weareafraidofthethingswedontknow,butourresponseshouldbetoeducateourselves,nottofurtherspread…fearsandmisunderstandings,”shesaid.Bracho-Sanchezsuggestedthatthemediashould“sticktothefacts”.Phansharedasimilarview:“It’simportant…toseeusinallourdiversity(多樣性),asindividualhumanbeings,andtochallengestereotypes(亥U板印象).Thecoronavirusisahumantragedy,solet’snotallowfeartobreed(弓I發(fā))hatred(仇恨),intoleranceandracism.”Insteadofspreadingmisinformationandfuelingfearfulthoughts,weshoulddoeverythingwecantosupportthosewhoareaffectedbyeventssuchastheCOVID-19outbreak.Afterall,therealenemyisthevirus,notthepeoplewhoarefightingit.WhatdoParagraphs2-3mainlytalkabout?HowCOVID-19hasspreadoutsideofChina.HowothercountriesdealwithCOVID-19.COVID-19leadingtoracismagainstChinesepeople.COVID-19affectingbusinessandtourismworldwide.WhatdidBracho-Sancheztellpeoplewithherwords?Themediahelpseducatepeople.It’sharmfultofearwhatwedon’tknow.It’sbettertokeepyourfearstoyourself.It'shelpfultolearnaboutunknownthings.WhatattitudedoestheauthorholdtowardtheCOVID-19outbreak?Shehopespeopleworktogethertofightthevirus.SheblamesChineseforspreadingthevirusabroad.Shethinksthemediaisresponsibleformisinformation.D.ShecriticizesChinafornotdoingenoughtocontainthevirus.DUKphysicistIsaacNewtononcesaid,“Natureispleasedwithsimplicityandnatureisnodummy(傻子)."Indeed,MotherNaturecanprovidealmosteverythinghumanbeingsneedifwefollowherrules.Butifwebreaktherules,sheislikelytobecruelandlashoutatus.Theoutbreakofthenovelcoronaviruspneumonia(新型冠狀病毒肺炎,NCP)inChinaandsomeothercountriesatthebeginningofthisyearisanexample.AccordingtoXinhuaNewsAgency,thenewcoronavirusissimilartoavirusfoundinabatin2017andprobablyhasanintermediatehost中間宿主).It’sbelievedthatthevirusoriginatedfromtheHuananSeafoodMarketinWuhan,Hubeiprovince,wherelivewildanimalsweresold.TheWallStreetJournalreportedthatDrPeterDaszak,presidentoftheUS-basedhealthorganizationEcoHealthAlliance,said,“Thisoutbreakisalessonforus.Onaglobalscale(規(guī)模),humanpopulationdensity密度),wildlifediversity,andlandusechangearewhatdrivenewpandemics(流行病).”Inancienttimes,peopleneededtorelyonnaturetosurvivesotheyhelditinawe(敬畏).Forexample,theAmericanIndiansbelievedthathumansareapartofnatureandnatureisapartofhumans.Chineseancientsalwayspursuedtheharmonybetweennatureandhumanbeings.However,ashumanbeingsmastermoreknowledgeandmakemoreadvancedtools,peopletrytochangeandevenconquernature.Theyusemorelandtomakebuildings,geneticallymodify(改變)plants,capturesomewildandrareanimalstosuittheirownneeds.Inthisprocess,humansgraduallylosecontactwithnatureandeventhrowitoutofbalance.Forexample,cuttingalargenumberofforestsmeanscarbondioxidemustbuildupintheatmosphereanditcontributestoglobalwarming.Althoughwedon’tknowforsurewhatfirstcau

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論