Euthanasia-完整辯論版內(nèi)容

A:Hello！welcometoourdiscussion.I’mjoinedtodaybyBandC.i’msoleilB:AndI’mBC:I’mC.A:oh,Hello,C.doyouknowaboutEuthanasia?B:Yes.thatispeoplewhoareattackedbyincurablediseasecan’tsurfferfromthepainsanddecidetoemployahumanewaytoendtheirliveswithoutpain.C：doyouthinkEuthanasiaShouldBeLegalized正方：Wethinkit’snecessary.Ononehand,wecansaveourlimitingmedicalresourcesforthosewhoneedtreatmentthananyotherpeople.Ontheotherhand,wecankeeppatientsfromendlesspaint.我們認為這是有必要的。一方面，我們可以節(jié)約有限的醫(yī)療資源給其他更需要的治療的病人。另一方面，我們可以解脫這些受著無盡的痛苦的病人。補充觀點：1.Euthanasiacanreleasethestressofthesociety,ifthepatientscan’tdoanycontribution.如果那個病人無法做出任何貢獻，那么安樂死可以減輕社會的負擔。2.Euthanasiacanfreethepatientswhoareunderheavypaint.安樂死可以解脫那些正承受著巨大痛苦的病人。3.Aperson’slifebelongstohimself,hehasaccesstoendhislife.一個人的生命屬于他自己，他有權結束自己的生命。Wefeelthissuffering,wehavecomewiththisthenyouhavenochoiceinthecircumstances,wehavechoseneuthanasia.Thisisnotcontemptforlife,norisitmoraldecline.Instead,itwasatimeinthelivesoftormentandsufferingtothelovedonesaroundustothepeoplewelove.moreacceptablealternativetotheroad.Therefore,webelievethateuthanasiaisaformofrespectforlife.我們感受著這種痛苦，我們體會著這個中滋味，在無法選擇的情況下，我們選擇了安樂死。這不是對生命的藐視，也不是道德的淪喪。反而，這是一種在生命面臨煎熬和磨難的時候，為我們身邊的親人，為我們愛著的人，選擇另一條更容易接受的道路。因此，我方認為，安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式反方：Ithinkweshouldn’tmakeeuthanasialegal.Otherwise,somepeoplemaycommitsuicidethroughthisway,whichofferthemaneasywaytodie.Inaddition,itcanbeanlegalwaytodeprive(剝奪)people’slife,forthosewhohaveevilintentions.So,Idon’tagreethispoint.補充觀點：1.Euthanasiaisarejectionoftheimportanceandvalueofhumanlife安樂死是拒絕了人類生活的意義和價值Thepoorwilltrulybekilledbypovertythrougheuthanasia,becauseofnomoneyfortreatment.窮人會真正地被貧窮以這種形式給殺死，因為沒錢治療。Euthanasiaisdisguisedviolationsoftherighttolife安樂死是變相侵害生命權"euthanasia"iflegalformconfirmdown,maybesomepeopleusetodeprivingthelifeofothers.Inaddition,totheunderstandingofthediseaseinhumansisstillverylimitedcircumstances,withoutlegallicenseandothersendlife,contrarytotherighttolivemoralprinciples.“安樂死”如果以法律形式確認下來，可能會被一些人利用，用以非法剝奪他人的生命。另外，在人類對疾病的認識還十分有限的情況下，未經(jīng)法律許可而結束他人生命，有悖于生存權利的道德準則Euthanasia

Should

Be

LegalizedBothofbirthanddeatharenaturalevents.However,people’sattitudestowardsthemarevastlydifferent.Birthiscelebratedwithjoyandexcitement,whilewhenitcomestodeath,peopletrytheirbesttoavoidit.Thatisalsothereasonwhyeuthanasiaisapproachedwithopposition.Euthanasiawasfirstlegalizedinwhichcountry?Why?:TheNetherlandslegalizedeuthanasiaonMondayApril1st,2002.Itwaspracticedillegallyformanyyearsprior.Thiswasthefirstcountryintheworldtomakeitlegal.Suffocationwithaplasticbag,mostofthetime(butnotallofthetime)druggingthepatientfirst.Gassingthemtodeathwithcarbonmonoxide:notevenapprovedforputtingdownadogorexecutingaconvictedmurdererLethalinjection,butfamiliesarenotusuallyallowedtowatchbecauseoftheeffectsofthispoisonPillsareadministeredincasesofassistedsuicide,noteuthanasia.Thedifferenceisthatwhenthepatienttakespillsprescribedbyadoctor,theyareendingtheirownlife.Manypeoplebelievethatlegalizingfull-fledgedeuthanasiawillstoptheuseofplasticbagsandcarbonmonoxide,butthatwillsimplylegitimizetheiruse.Terminallyillpatientsgenerallydonotdieanunbearablypainfuldeath.

Manypatientsareabletoliveouttheirfewfinaldaysinadrug-inducedstupor,relievingthemofmostpainwhileleavingthemcognizantenoughtointeractwithfamily.Iseuthanasiaofanimalsconsideredanimalcruelty,giveyourviews?:Animaleuthanasia

istheactofinducinghumanedeathinananimal.Euthanasiamethodsaredesignedtocauseminimalpainanddistress.

Petsarealmostalwayseuthanizedbyintravenousinjectiontypicallyaveryhighdoseofabarbituratesuchaspentobarbital.

Unconsciousness,respiratorydistressandthencardiacarrestfollowrapidly,usuallywithin30seconds.

Observersgenerallydescribeitasaquickandpeacefuldeath.Sometimestheanimalmakesagaspingsoundaf