(完整word版)SCI修改稿回答審稿人意見范文模板大全,推薦文檔

1、 sci 修改稿回答審稿人意見范文模板大全修改稿回答審稿人的意見（最重要的部分）list of responsesdear editors and reviewers:thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning ourmanuscript entitled “paper title” (id: 文章稿號(hào)). those comments are all valuableand very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as th

2、e importantguiding significance to our researches. we have studied comments carefully and havemade correction which we hope meet with approval. revised portion are marked inred in the paper. the main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewerscomments are as flowing:responds to the re

3、viewers comments:reviewer #1:1. response to comment: (簡要列出意見)response: 2. response to comment: (簡要列出意見)response: 。逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏針對(duì)不同的問題有下列幾個(gè)禮貌術(shù)語可適當(dāng)用用：we are very sorry for our negligence of .we are very sorry for our incorrect writing . it is really true as reviewer suggested thatwe have made corr

4、ection according to the reviewers comments.we have re-written this part according to the reviewers suggestionas reviewer suggested thatconsidering the reviewers suggestion, we have 最后特意感謝一下這個(gè)審稿人的意見：special thanks to you for your good comments.reviewer #2:同上述reviewer #3:other changes:1. line 60-61, t

5、he statements of “” were corrected as “”2. line 107, “” was added3. line 129, “” was deletedwe tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in themanuscript. these changes will not influence the content and framework of thepaper. and here we did not list the changes but marked in r

6、ed in revised paper.we appreciate for editors/reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that thecorrection will meet with approval.once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions 以下是審稿人意見和本人的回復(fù)。與大家分享。從中可以看出，這位審稿人認(rèn)真讀了文章，提出很多寶貴的意見。這些意見分布在文章的各個(gè)地方。我很詫異有人真正讀了我的文章?？吹竭@些意見，我覺得很感激，不是因?yàn)榻邮瘴恼碌脑?/p>

7、，而是這些意見能真正有助于提高文章的質(zhì)量。從中還看出，回答審稿人問題的“技巧”。對(duì)于回答問題，有的人就是一味反駁，卻不加改進(jìn)。記得 acs style guide 里面說，當(dāng)審稿人問到問題的，哪怕是他理解錯(cuò)誤，這也說明作者這么寫，其他讀者也會(huì)理解錯(cuò)誤，引起歧義。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表達(dá)不引起歧義。因此：有時(shí)間一味反駁，還不如指出具體改進(jìn)在第幾頁、第幾段。=reviewers comments:reviewer #3: while revising the script, it is to be suggested that author shouldclearly indicate t

8、he aim & scope of the study and while making conclusion, it is to bementioned how the study is useful for the practical purposes. in addition the followingare the few suggestions/comments, which may be included while revision.1. introduction part first para last line, author must avoid to write ambi

9、guousstatement i.e., much work is still ahead, may indicate properly. 2. author could not demonstrate the reason why, to select the organic compoundsuch as ethyl pyruvate for this study?3. experimental part: it is difficult to understand the in-situ rairs experimentswith homemade liquid-solid rairs

10、cell. more detailed information may be useful forthe others those who are working in the area. photograph of the assembled cell maybe included.4. the description given for the experimental set up (page 4) can be presented byflow diagram instead, as an ease to understand the set up.5. resluts part (p

11、age 6): co adlayers with identical monolayer coverages, themonolayer coverage, is it been performed with some adsorption model? further, itwas suggested that co-saturated pt surface, but not mentioned about the saturationexperiments. is it obtained after 60 min of co bubbling?6. page 12, 2nd para: t

12、he displacement of etpy by ccl4 flushing, is it confirmedby the etpy peaks? if so, it has to be mentioned clearly in the para. also in the samepara, author referred for fig. 7a and 7b but in the figures, it didnt appear, only figure7 appeared. i feel it refers for figure 7, portion a and b, to be co

13、rrected. similarly, inthe text referred the fig 2a, 2b. etc but on the figure sheet it is mentioned as 2a,2b .etc. to be corrected.7. page 14, 1st para: contamination of the pt surface by corrosion of o-rings inhigh concentration etpy, but the statement has not been supported by otherevidence/litera

14、ture.8. pages 14 through 17: the observed reactivity of various solvents for adsorbed co on the pt surface (figs 3 & 4) has to be discussed more precisely. this reviewer isunable to follow the reason why they showed different reactivity, is it principally dueto the organic moieties, or due to the im

15、purities of commercially available chemicalsor a mixed effect. it has to be clearly demonstrated, however, the only experimentperformed with co/water? ccl4 would difficult to describe it in detail.9. the author try to restrain with repeated arguments in the text e.g., page 3 para1: it was generalize

16、d that., also appeared on page 21 first para.10. captions of the figures are too long, the detailed description already given inthe text, hence would not be included here. captions should be short and crispy.=dear editor,i quite appreciate your favorite consideration and the reviewers insightfulcomm

17、ents. now i have revised the jcis-06- 247 exactly according to the reviewerscomments, and found these comments are very helpful. i hope this revision can makemy paper more acceptable. the revisions were addressed point by point below.general the objective of this research was added at the beginning

18、of the thirdparagraph of introduction. how the study is useful for practical purposes was added atthe end of conclusion as one paragraph.1 ambiguous statement i.e., “much work is still ahead” was deleted. 2 ethyl pyruvate was used here as a typical compound (containing twocarbonyl groups) to demonst

19、rate the feasibility of using our diagnosing tool to detectlow-coverage co (coming from decarbonylation of etpy) at the liquid-solid interface.etpy is a reactant used in liquid-phase chiral catalysis, and slight decomposition ofetpy to adsorbed co was reported to influence the catalytic performance.

20、 in addition,by studying that, we can directly compare our results with previous studies. moredetails in the first paragraph of section 3.2.3 the ir cell was designed according to the ir cells used by manyelectrochemical workers. references were added. a photo was given in thesupporting information.

21、4 a flow diagram of the experimental setup was given in the new fig. 1.5 the co adsorption experiments were performed in the same adsorption mode,by bubbling co through a clean pt surface in different days to achieve the samesaturation coverage of co. initial experiments indicated that given the co

22、bubblingrate was 0.85 cm3/min, co can saturate on pt after 30-45 min. we bubble co for 60min to guarantee the same co coverage. if we bubble co for more time, or if weincrease the co flowing rate several times, the co saturation coverage doesntchange, indicating 60 min is already enough. a figure sh

23、owing the co uptake as a function of bubbling time was given in the supporting information.6 the displacement of etpy by ccl4 was confirmed by the removing of etpypeaks. the mention of fig. 7a and 7b etc. throughout the text were all corrected.7 it is known that some solvents such as acetone can cor

24、rode the viton o-ring.we saw the damage of o-ring after using high-concentration etpy. a reference to theviton o-ring information was given.8 the observed reactivity trend is due to a combination of both effects, with theaccumulation of organic moieties on pt surface during numerous flushing cycles

25、themore important reason. a few proper sentences were added to clarity this point.9 the repeated arguments in the first paragraph in section 4.3 were deleted.10 the too-long captions were significantly shortened.in all, i found the reviewers comments are quite helpful, and i revised my papepoint-by-

26、point. thank you and the review again for your help!=結(jié)果： /10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.005歡迎瀏覽：organic chemistry on solid surfaces (review)z. ma, f. zaera*, surface scence reports 61 (2006) 229-281.sciencedirect top25 hottest articles in chemistry/10.1016/j.surfrep.2006.03.

27、001 ci 修改稿回答審稿人意見范文模板修改稿回答審稿人的意見（最重要的部分）list of responsesdear editors and reviewers:thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning ourmanuscript entitled “paper title” (id: 文章稿號(hào)). those comments are all valuableand very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as th

28、e importantguiding significance to our researches. we have studied comments carefully and havemade correction which we hope meet with approval. revised portion are marked inred in the paper. the main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewerscomments are as flowing:responds to the reviewers comments:reviewer #1:1. response to comment: (簡要列出意見)response: 2. response to comment: (簡要列出意見)response: 。逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏 針對(duì)不同的問題有下列幾個(gè)禮貌術(shù)語