國(guó)際私法第四章

4-1法則區(qū)別說(shuō)TheoryofStatutes3-1-1意大利的法則區(qū)別說(shuō)TheItalianSchool3-1-1-1產(chǎn)生背景Background3-1-1-2代表人物及主要觀點(diǎn)Bartolus’sargument:Personallawv.Reallaw3-1-1-3評(píng)價(jià)及影響Comments3-1-2法國(guó)的法則區(qū)別說(shuō)TheFrenchSchool3-1-2-1Dumoulin’sContribution:Partyautonomy3-1-2-2d’Agentre’snotion:mixedlaw&territorrialism第四章適用外國(guó)法的理由Justificationforapplicationofforeignlaw

MemberStates(62)oftheHagueConferenceonPrivateInternationalLaw4-2國(guó)際禮讓說(shuō)ComityTheory3-2-1產(chǎn)生背景Background3-2-2代表人物Huber的主要觀點(diǎn)Huber’sMainOpinions3-2-3評(píng)價(jià)和影響Comments4-3法律關(guān)系本座說(shuō)

LegalRelationshipSeatTheory3-3-1背景Background3-3-2代表人物Savigny的主要觀點(diǎn)Savigny’sArgumentsHerejectedtheStatutistdoctrine,theunilateralapproachandtheprimacyoftheLexfori.InsteadSavignyadoptedandperfectedthebilateralchoice-of-lawapproach3-3-3評(píng)價(jià)和影響commentsandIt’sInfluences4-4既得權(quán)說(shuō)

DoctrineofVestedRights3-4-1歷史條件HistoricalBackground3-4-2代表人物Dicey的主要觀點(diǎn)Dicey’sIdea3-4-3影響和評(píng)價(jià)Comments4-5本地法說(shuō)

LocalLawTheory3-5-1背景BackgroundStory的國(guó)際禮讓說(shuō)；Beale的既得權(quán)說(shuō)3-5-2Cook的解說(shuō)Cook’sExplanationTheLogicalandLegalbasesofConflictofLaws（1942）3-5-3貢獻(xiàn)與不足Contributions4-6政府利益分析說(shuō)

GovernmentalInterestsAnalysis3-6-1背景Background3-6-2Currie的主要觀點(diǎn)Currie’scontributionRejectionofallchoice-of-lawrulestheconceptofgovernmentalinterestsFalseconflictsV.trueconflicts3-6-3影響和適用it’sapplicationinUSA4-7最密切聯(lián)系原則

DoctrineoftheMost

SignificantRelationship3-7-1背景Background3-7-2第二次沖突法重述TheRestatementSecondThe“most-significant-relationship”formulaRules:someblack-letterchoice-of–lawrulesPresumptiverulesAdhocanalysis3-7-3影響和適用it’sapplication21stateshadadoptedtheRestatementSecondfortort,and25forcontract,severalfor‘mixed”approach4-8中國(guó)學(xué)者的解說(shuō)

ChineseScholar’sExplanation3-8-1國(guó)際交往互利DoctrineofMutualBenefitofinternationalCommunication3-8-2適用外國(guó)法的具體理由theparticularreasoningA.有時(shí)對(duì)本國(guó)國(guó)家和當(dāng)事人更有利B.有時(shí)是必須的C.是國(guó)家主權(quán)和法律協(xié)調(diào)的結(jié)果D.適用外國(guó)法并不違背國(guó)家主權(quán)

Comitywasdefinedassomethingbetweenmerecourtesyandalegalduty,asderivedfromthetacitconsentofnationandbasedonmutualforbearanceandenlightenedself-interest.Inatenpageessay,themostfamousoftheseauthors,UlricusHuber(1624-1694),postulatedthefollowingthreeaxioms:

(1)Thelawsofeachstatehaveforcewithintheterritorybutnotbeyond.(2)Theselawsbindallthosewhoarefoundwithintheterritory,whetherpermanentlyortemporarily.(3)

Outofcomity,foreignlawsmaybeappliedsothatrightsacquiredunderthemcanretainthetheirforce,providedthattheydonotprejudicethestate’spowerorrights.

案例4-1Babcockv.Jackson1963年9月，住所在紐約的夫婦Jackson邀請(qǐng)同住一城的Babcock小姐驅(qū)車到加拿大作周末旅游。J