




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
.Introduction1.1TheObjectiveoftheStudyForitsadvantagessuchasdiversificationofeducationresources,accessibility,popularityandautonomy,muchmoreattentionhasbeenpaidtoMOOC—anewtypeofnetworkteachingplatformgrowinginrecentyearswithburgeoningdemands.Toacertainextent,theappearanceofMOOCcanpartlyremedythestereotypeintraditionalteachingliketheoutmodedcontentsandrigidpatterns.AgreatamountofinspirationonEnglishoralcompetencywillbesuppliedwiththoseminoritycollegestudentswhoarenotgoodatcommunicatingwithothersinEnglishandlackofhigh–qualityeducationalsourceswithitssuperiorityandspecialty.Thetargetofthisstudymainlyembodiesinthreefacets:explorationofproblemsoccurredinthepossessoforalcommunicationwithChineseminoritycollegestudents,thecomparisonbetweenmodernteachingmethod–MOOCandthetraditionalteachingmethodandthecombinationofadvantagesofbothtwomethods.ItaimsatinformingabettermethodtohelpChineseminoritycollegestudentsimprovetheirEnglishoralcompetencyandachieveahighereducationlevel,whichisheadingformakinganimbalancedandimpartialeducation.1.2TheBackgroundoftheStudyLiManliinherbooksaysthateducationhasalwaysbeenviewedasthecruxintheprogressanddevelopmentofhumanandmakingalatentinfluenceonthevicissitudeofanynationorpeople.ThereisanimbalanceascribingtofactorsconcerninglocationandsocietyorthelackofaunanimousEnglishteachingskeletonleadingtomanyproblemsoccurredintheprocessofcognitionandacquisition.Especiallyforthosestudentslivinginthefar-remoteregionsofChinawhoarestudyingintheabsenceofhigh-qualityeducationresource.Englishisasubjecttowhomitmakesahigherrequirementforself-qualityoflearnersandfaculties.Hence,itisatoppriorityforeducationinminorityborderregionstobefosteredanddevelopedrapidly.Fromtheoutsetof20thcentury,thereisanattemptforsearchingexcellentteachingmethodsforEFLlearnerstohaveagoodcommandofEnglishinashorttime.ManyradicalchangeshavehappenedonEFLteachingwithinonecentury,liketherealizationofEFLteachingandlearningfromthepublicandthetransitionfromteacher-orientedtolearner-orientedresearch.Moreover,influencedbyvariouslinguisticgenres,somenewteachingmethodshavecomeout,suchasaudio-lingualmethod、situationalteachingmethod、naturalapproachandcommunicativeapproach,etc.Ononehand,developmentofEFLteachinghasbeenstimulatedwiththeassistantofnewteachingmethod.Ontheotherhand,amplenewteachingmethodsalsoenrichtheguidanceofEFLteachingfromtheoreticalaspect.Butneithergrammar-translationapproachintheearliestdaysnorfunctionalandcommunicativeteachingmethod,whicharetwoprevailingteachingmethodsbeingusedinChineseclass,canradicallymakeallthestudentshaveagoodcommandofforeignlanguages.Consequently,aneffectivewayofacquirementforEnglishisstillaproblembeingdiscussed,whichcausesmuchcontemplationfrompeopleforvariousmethodsforEFLteaching.AsacompulsorycourseaccompanyingwiththeentirestudycareerofanystudentinChina,Englisheducation,particularlyhighereducationrequiresahigherstandardforEFL,whichwouldbeakeyskillbeingfrequentlyemphasized.Currently,mostuniversitiesinChinaarefollowingtheorthodoxwayofteaching,whichisateacher-centeredclassthatstudentspassivelyacceptorrecordtheknowledgefromteachers,andthewayoftestingisalsooutmodedsothatmoststudentswhorecitethecoreknowledgeofclasscanpassthefinalexam.SuchafecklessteachingpatternwilleventuallyleadcollegestudentstoadilemmawheretheytrulyhavegonethroughanEnglishclassduringtheperiodofcollegeandgotadecentscorewhichcannotrepresentthecompetencytheyarereallyequippedwithsothattheywouldfailinrelevantstudyorworkinthefuture.Toomanyflawsexistintraditionalteachingpattern,butthereareconsistentrevolutionshappeningonthisfield.MOOCisoneofthoseconducivetrailswithlotsofexpectation(ChenXiaogengandWangXiangming,2013:23).Sharingandtransmissionofeducationalresourcehavebenefittomanyfieldsintheerapredominatedbythenetworktechnology.In2012,MOOCsprungupwiththeopeningoflecturesfromprestigiousuniversitiestolearnersthroughouttheworld,whichwascalledthe“thefirstyearofMOOC”.NowagreatnumberofuniversitiesoffercoursesconsistingofvarioussubjectsontheInternet,andatthesametime,learnersallovertheworldhaveaccesstoenjoyinghigh-qualityeducationresource.MassiveOpenOnlineCourses(usuallyabbreviatedMOOC)makesitpossibleforanyonetograspanyinformationfromthisplatformanywherebasedontheInternetatanytime,whichistheworthofMOOC.ChenXiaogengpointsoutthattheyearof2013wasalsodesignatedasthefirstyearofMOOCinChina,sincethat,ChineseuniversitiesandeducationinstitutionshavejoinedthearmyofMOOCtobuildupanewMOOCwithChinesecharacters.1.3TheSignificanceoftheStudyThisstudyfeaturesminoritycollegestudentsasanessentialobjectwithMOOC–ateachingmethodthatisbanguptodaterespondingtotheageofInternet.Throughsomeinvestigationsorinterviewsonminoritycollegestudents,aseriesofproblemswouldappearwhichprovidealargenumberofinformationforcomparativeresearchontraditionalteachingmethodvs.MOOC.BorrowedfromMOOC,theadvantagesandcontentsofitwillpositivelybenefittothetraditionaleducation,whichcanbreakupthelimitationfromtimeandspace.EspeciallyforthosestudentsandteacherslivinginremoteregionsofChina,freeandhigh-qualityeducationresourcescanbesharedandtransmittedtoeveryclass.Meanwhile,MOOCwillpushtheimprovementofteachingmethodtoahigherfloor,thatis,themixedteachingmethod,whichMOOCwillassistorbeembeddedintotraditionalclassinordertomakeitmoreactiveandvivid.Ononehand,MOOCisanauxiliarywayofacceleratingthestudent’sunderstandingofknowledgeorasupplementforadditionalknowledge.Ontheotherhand,MOOCmaypotentiallydecreaseoravoidmanynegativeeffectsorflawsfromtraditionalteachingmethodsuchaslow-efficiency,cramteachingorexam-orientedteaching.Althoughtheinstitutionsfortheselectionofexcellentstudentcannotbechangedinashorttime,tosomeextent,themixedteachingmethodmayincreasethequalityofeducationandtheefficiencyofteachingandlearning.Furthermore,ifonlycaliberofteachinghasbeenguaranteed,MOOCthatboastslow-costandmaturitymightbringasaveoflocalgovernmentfundingforeducation,manpowerandmaterialresources.2.LiteratureReview2.1TheDefinitionofTraditionalTeachingMethodAccordingtothedefinitionofteachingpatternfromHuangPuquanandWangBenlu,constituteelementsofteachingpatternconsistoftheoreticbasis,teachingtargets,operationalprocedures,conditionsforrealizationandteachingassessment.Traditionalteachingmethodorpatternisoneofteachingpatterns,includingmanybranchessuchaslecture-styleteachingmethod,findingteachingmethod,masteringteachingmethodandexplainingandreceivingteachingmethod,etc.Foralongtime,explainingandreceivingmethodhasbeenubiquitouslyacceptedbyhighereducationinChina.Asfarastheauthorisconcerned,traditionalteachingmethodinChina,toacertainextent,shouldbeequaltotheexplainingandreceivingmethod.JohannFriedrichHerbart,thefounderofpedagogyasanacademicdiscipline,setuptheexplainingandreceivingmethod(YangXiaowei,2010:310).Afterhisfollowers’perfection,ithasbecome“fiveformalsteps”teachingmethodthatispopularinChina.Itfeatureshigh-efficiencylearningwiththeguidanceofateacherinaunittime,whichgratifiesthedemandsoftalentscultivationafterindustrialization.However,itisobviousthatthe“fiveformalsteps”teachingmethodoveremphasizesfunctionofteacherwhichwouldcontrolthelearner’swayofthinking.Accordingly,thereisnomuchroomforlearnerstothinkfreely,evensomelearnerswouldformabadhabitlikeindolenceorthelackofmotivation(LaiZhikui,1998:121).2.2TheDefinitionofMOOCDuetothepossessionoffivebasicelementsforcomposingateachingmethod,MOOCwouldalsobecalledateachingpattern.TheauthorattemptstodefineMOOCasanup-to-datenetworkteachingmethodwithsupportofbehaviorismandconstructivism.Inthefirstplace,suchanetworkteachingmethodshouldstronglyrelyontheInternetinordertosetupavisualnetworkclassforteachingandlearningactivities.Inthesecondplace,forfreeingfromcrammingteaching,thetheoriesofMOOCarebasedonbehaviorismandconstructivism,whichcanstimulatetheabilityofautonomouslearning.MOOCemphasizeslearningshouldbeanactiveprocessinwhichlearnershavesufficienttimetobuildupnewknowledgeandmakeplansbythemselves,contentsofteachingshouldbethebeginningoflearningratherthantheend.Lastbutnottheleast,comparedwithtraditionalnetworkteachingmethod,MOOChasadaptedtothesocialdemands.Traditionalnetworkteachingmethod,suchascorrespondencecourse,onlinecoursesofferedbycollegesandavarietyofopencourses,alsodevelopsfromthebasisofnetwork,butaseriesofflawshavebecomemoreandmoreseriousasoutdateteachingcontents,singleteachingformandinefficientcurricularforum,whichwouldleadtoalowspeeddevelopmentofnetworkteachingmethod.Toalargeextent,theinventionofMOOCistoovercomethosedefectsandincreasetheutilizationrateofnetworkcourses.2.3OverseasStudyonMOOCBoththeoreticalresearchandpracticalresearchstartedearlyoverseas.Firstly,theoreticalresearch.AlthoughMOOCreflectsthecharactersoftraditionalteachingmethodandnetworkteachingmethod,ithasauniquewayofpracticeinsteadofthosetwoteachingmethods.Itmeansthatfacultiesandstudentsshouldadjusttothisnewteachingmethod.Fromtheaspectofteachers,theyshouldlearntotakefullyadvantageofnewmediatodevelopthemselves.Fromtheaspectofstudents,diverselearningexperiencewouldbefixedon,especiallyabundantexperienceofnetworklearning.However,someresearcherssuchasprofessorsinTsinghuaUniversityorStanfordUniversityholdtheoppositeviewofMOOCthatithasonlychangedthecontentsnotitsform.Secondly,practiceresearch.MostpracticeresearchesofMOOC,nomatterinAmericathecradleofMOOCorothercountriesincludingChina,totallyconcentrateontheconstructionofsomewebsitesboastingMOOCandthepublicityofMOOCasateachingmethod.Amongstthem,threeAmericanMOOCwebsitesarethemostsuccessful,Coursera,edXandUdacity.Inrecentyears,twocentersofthedevelopmentofMOOChaveformed,AmericaandAsia.CollegesinTaiwanandHongKongarewell-knownfortheirMOOCamongallkindsofcollegesanduniversitiesinAsia.Forinstance,TaiwanNationalUniversity,makessignificantinnovationsonthebasisoforiginalMOOC.Meanwhile,highenthusiasmhasbeenpaidtoMOOCbystudentsinTaiwanNationalUniversityowingtoitsstrongrecognition.2.4DomesticStudyonMOOCComparedwithoverseasstudy,domestictheoreticalstudyfallsbehindtheaverageandroughlycanbedividedintotwostages.Thefirststageisdominatedbytranslationofoverseasacademicliterature.ThenumberofpaperonMOOCaregrowingrapidly.DeclarativeintroductionandoverseasapplicationofMOOCarewildlyspreadbylargeamountofpublication.EspeciallyTsinghuaUniversitymakesgreatcontributionstoresearchesonMOOCthatpublishedtwobooksDecodingMOOCasalargescaleopenonlinecourseeducationinvestigation(LiManli,2013:16)andThecollegiaterevolution-highereducationintheeraofMOOC(WuJianping,2014:24)withintwomonths.Thesecondstageistheoreticalinvention.WithmajoritiesofliteratureonMOOCpublished,domesticscholarsstartedtodiscusstheinfluenceofMOOC,anewtypeofnetworkteachingmethod,onteachersandstudents.However,mostofresearchesinthisperiodfocusedontheconversionoflearningmethodratherthanteachingmethods.Additionally,theextentofdomesticstudyonMOOCwasnearlythesameasthatindevelopedwesterncountriesfromtheaspectofpractice.DomesticuniversitieswerekeenonestablishingcollaborativerelationshipswiththreemajorMOOCwebsites,Coursera,edXandUdacity.Meanwhile,theyalsobuiltuptheirownMOOCteachingplatform.Forexample,UOOCwasthebiggestMOOCunioninChinawiththeguidanceofShenzhenUniversityinMay12th,2014,butitwasmerelyrestrictedtoplatformdeveloping,andstillnotmatureinpracticaloperation.3.Methodology3.1TheResearchQuestionsAccordingly,thestudyraisesthefollowingquestionstobeexploredinthisresearch:1.WhatarethesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenMOOCandtraditionalteachingmethod?2.HowshouldtheimprovementforEnglishoralcompetencyofminoritycollegestudentsbeachievedwiththecombinationofMOOCandtraditionalteachingmethod?3.2ResearchParticipantsThereare68participantsinthequestionnairesectionwhoaresecondandthirdyearminoritystudentsfromYunnanMinzuUniversity.Amongthem,thepercentageofstudentsmajoredinEnglishtakesup30.88%(21peopleinBai,Miao,Yi,Lisu,Hui,Zhuang,Naxi,Bulangminoritygroups),andtherestarenon-Englishmajorstudentswhoarespecializedinvariousmajors,whichtakesup69.12%(47peopleinBai,Miao,Yi,Lisu,Hui,Zhuang,Naxi,Bulang,Tibetan,Man,Nu,Dai,Jingpo,Hani,TujiaandMongolianminoritygroups).Basically,alltheparticipantsinthisresearchcanrepresentthegenerallevelofEnglishoralcommunicationcompetencyofminoritycollegestudentsinYunnanProvince.Firstly,duetothecharacterofYunnanMinzuUniversitywhichisfeaturedasauniversityfosteringexcellentgraduatorsfromeachminoritygroupinYunnanProvince,evennationwide,whichcanprovidealotofgoodsamplesforthisresearch.Secondly,nearlyallthesamplesareinhabitantsinYunnanProvince.ConsideringnopublicEnglishcourseprovidedforjuniorsexceptEnglishmajorstudents,inthesectionofinterviewandresearch,5participantsarefilteredfromthevolunteersinquestionnairesectionwhoareallsophomores.Theseparticipantsareseparatedinto2groups--experimentalgroupofMOOCandcontrolgroupoftraditionalteachingmethod.Amongthem,twoEnglishmajorstudentsandonestudentmajoredinpublicadministrationjoininthegroupofMOOC,andtwoEnglishmajorstudentsjoinintheothergroupinordertocomparebothtwoteachingmethods.Theresearchlastsfortwoweeks(14days),duringtheperiodofcomparativeresearch,participantsinexperimentalgroupofMOOCareaskedtoregisteranaccountonthewebsite“MOOCofChina‘sUniversity”andsignupfora15-weekcourse“CollegeEnglish(oralEnglish)”givenbyPengTianxiao(/course/NUDT-17004),whoisanEnglishlecturerinNationalUniversityofDefenseTechnology(NUDT).Theparticipantsarefreetolearnatanytimeinanyplace,butnolessthan50%oftheclassarerequiredtohavebeencompletedbytheendofthe14-dayresearch(whenthecomparativeresearchstarts,thiscoursehasalreadybeeninprogressof8weeks,whichisoverthehalfofaggregateamount15weeks),andtheyalsoshouldabidebytheobligationoflecturersasassignment,discussionandexercises.Participantsincontrolgroupoftraditionalteachingmethodareaskedtocarefullyrecordwhattheyhavelearnt,contentsofclass,teachingtargetandwayofteaching.Theinterviewstakeplaceattheheadandthetailofthecontrastiveresearchincludinganoralinterview,twomodelIELTSspeakingtestsandaquestionnairewithregardtolearningattitude,learninghabitandnegativefactorsabouttheimprovementoforalEnglishcompetency.3.3DataCollectionDatainthesectionofquestionnairearecollectedthroughsomequestionswithreferencetobasicinformation(gender,nationalityandmajoraswellasthescoreofanyauthoritativeEnglishproficiencytestlikeCET-4/6,IELTSandTOEFL),viewofEnglishlearning,particularlyoralcommunication,MOOCandtraditionalteachingmethod.Intheendofthequestionnaire,anapplicationformconcerningaprojectforimprovementoforalEnglishcompetencyisattached,whichisthemainsourceofafurtherselectioninthesectionofinterviewandresearch.StudentsareaskedtocompletethequestionnairesandtaketheinterviewsinChinese.DataoftheinterviewarecollectedthroughanotherquestionnaireincludingsomemorespecificquestionsabouttheattitudetowardsEnglishproficiencytests,negativetransferofmothertongueaswellasthepersonalexperienceofMOOCandthedifferencesbetweenMOOCandtraditionalteachingmethodinvolunteers’opinion.Theinterviewandascheduleforrecordingwhathasbeenlearntbyvolunteersareprovidedintheendofatwo-weekstudy.Inordertomonitorthefluctuationofvolunteers’oralEnglishcompetency,twomodelIELTSspeakingtestsarerespectivelyprovidedforthematthebeginningandintheendoftheresearch,andthescoresofthevolunteersaremarkedbytheadministrationteamledbythemasteroftheprogrambasedontheIELTSSpeakingbanddescriptors.Besides,thevalidityofthemocktestshouldbethesameasthatoftheformalIELTSSpeakingtestwithnearlythesameandmuchstricterrequirementoftheexaminerandexamineefollowingIELTSofficialguidance.Testreportsgivefeedbacktothecandidatespromptly.4.ResultsandDiscussion4.1FindingsandDataAnalysisfromQuestionnairesChartIIChartIInthequestionnairesection,theparticipantsaretotallyminoritycollegestudentsenteringthisuniversityin2014and2015,andmainlycomefrom16differentmajorsinoneuniversity.AccordingtoChartI,thepercentageofpeoplewhohasnoauthoritativeEnglishtestscoretakesup94.12%,andtherestwhohaspassedCET-4merelytakesup5.88%.AuthoritativeEnglishtestlikeIELTS,TOEFLisanaccesstotestEnglishproficiency,whichcanmakecandidatesclearlyknowtheirEnglishlevel.Becauseofalackofcapacity,initiativeandconfidence,moststudentsinquestionnairesectionarenotwillingtoparticipateinexaminations,ChartIIChartIChartIIshowsthat63.24%participantsbelievetheirEnglishoralcompetencyislow,36.76%participantsconsidertheirEnglishoralcompetencybelowtheaverage.Thecruxoflowcapacityimpliesthattheystillhavenotmasteredanappropriatelearningmethod.Owingtothelackofinterestandhigh-qualityeducationresources,itcanpossiblyattributetomothertongue,eventhesocialenvironment.ChartIIIFromthefiguresinChartIII,nomorethan23.53%participantshaveanimpressionorknowledgeofMOOC.Manyreasonscanexplainthisphenomenon;Tobeginwith,thetransmissionofMOOCforuniversitiesinYunnanProvincestaysatanembarrassingsituation,mostcollegestudentshaveneverhearditinclass,evenfromtheInternet,whichalsorevealsthedeficiencyofinitiativeandattentionfromeducationdepartmentingovernmentorcollegeconcerned;Whatismore,MOOCisdistinctfromthetraditionalteachingmethodinmanyways,eventosomeextent,oppositetoit.Forthisstand,itcouldarousetoomuchchallengeaboutsuchafreshteachingmethod,whichmaystillneedalotoftimeforittobedigestedandachieveanacknowledgementinthefuture.ChartIII4.2FindingsandDataAnalysisfromInterviewsAccordingtotheinterviewquestionnaireinthecomparativeresearch,therearesomegeneralquestionsbeingaskedforallthecandidatestocomplete.Part2inthisinterviewquestionnaireisonlyprovidedforexperimentalgroupofMOOC,andPart3ofwhichshouldbeansweredbycontrolgroupoftraditionalteachingmethod.Meanwhile,5participantsarenumberedasC1,C2,C3,C4,C5inordertomakeitconvenientforstatisticsandanalysis.Amongthem,C1,C4andC5belongtoexperimentalgroupofMOOC,C2,C3areincludedintocontrolgroup.Partofquestionswithstrongrelationtotheresearchareselectedandanalyzedbelow.Thefirstquestionis“Inyouropinion,howmanyfactorshavingeffectsontheimprovementoforalEnglish?”Allparticipantsmentionedtheirstudyhabit.Theabsenceofthelanguage-studyingcontexthasbeenemphasizedlotsoftime.Atpresent,therearetwomainproblemsexistingformostoftheminoritycollegestudentswhoaremajoredinEnglish.ItcanbeseenfromquestionNo.4thatmoststudentsreplythattheyreallydon’tliketolearnEnglishduetotheirownminorityidentityorsocialenvironment.Becausethelackofhigh-qualityeducationresources,mostminoritycollegestudentsdon’thaveagoodfoundationofEnglish,whichleadstotheresultthattheycannotcatchupwithotherstudents.Therefore,lowscoreswillfollowandtheirinitiativewillbedamaged,whichwillformaviciouscircle.Aslackingofthecontextforlearninglanguage,minoritycollegestudentshavebeenlivinginplacesfarawayfromtheEnglish-speakingcountriessincetheywereyoung.MostminoritycustomsorlanguagewillinterferetheEnglishlanguagelearningaswell.Question6is“WhatdoyouthinkofyouroralEnglishcompetencyorwhatkindofproblemsdoyouhaveafterexperiencingthemodelIELTSSpeakingtestprovidedbytheproject?”C1,C3andC4saythattheproblemtheyhaveistheblocktheywouldmeetduringconceivingandexpressinginEnglish.MostofthemareusedtotranslatingtheirideasfromChinesetoEnglishbeforespeaking.C2hasn’tmentioneditclearly,butsheuses“depression”todepicthermind.Differentpeoplehavedifferentproblems,whichmakeithardtosummarize,butsimilaritiesstillexist.C1,C4andC5areinabsenceofrichvocabulary,andtheyfeeldiscontentwiththeiroralEnglishcompetency,eveniftheydesiretoexpressthemselves,theyusuallysufferfromthelackofvariouslexicalresourcesnomatterhownicetheirideais.Exceptforthequestionconcerningaboutthecontenttheyspeak,pronunciationisanotherchallengeforthem.Outofsomedisadvantagesdeprivingfromtheirminoritygroup,forexample,languagesofwhichordialectswillbethenegativetransferfortheirEnglishlearningevenbethegreatestfactorresultinginmistakesorinaccuracyhappeningduringtheirspeaking,wayofspeakingandlocalcustomorculturearethenegativefactorsforthemtospeakcorrectlyandprecisely.4.3FindingsandDataAnalysisfromComparativeResearchCChartIVThebarchartabovereflectsthefluctuationofthecandidates’oralEnglishcompetency;Itisobviousthatmodeltestscoreofmostcandidatesarelowerthantheaveragepointofthewholecountry(accordingtoIELTSofficialdocument,5.6wastheIELTSSpeakingtestaveragepointofChinamainlandin2015).Alltheinitialtestscoresareunder5.0thatcanbeconstruedasmodestuserlevelfromtheIELTS9-bandscale.Tobemorespecific,5participants,nomattertheyaremajoredinEnglishornotdonothaveagoodcommandofEnglish,arenotabletodealwithoverallmeaningandhandleadvancedcommunicationinmostsituations,mistakesfrequentlyoccurintheirconversations.Whenitcomestofinaltestscore,itisapparentfromthebarchartthat,smallprogresshasbeenmadebyeverycandidateafterthetwo-weekcomparativeresearch.C1wasgraded1morepoint,whichisthegreatestprogressamongallthecandidates.C3stillremainsthesamelevelastheinitialtestandtherestallgaintheirownprogress(controlgroup:C2,C3;experimentalgroupofMOOC:C1,C4andC5).Factorscontributingtothisphenomenonembodyinmanyfields.FromtheaspectofMOOC,thenewteachingpattern,whichbringsanewwayofinteractingwiththelecturersandmeanwhileinspirestheabilityofactivelearning.Mixedwiththepracticalcontentsofthecourse,everylessonhasbeencarefullydesignedformakingagoodteachingandlearningeffect.Suchahigh-qualityeducationresourcewouldbeterriblyneededinfar-remoteregionsinChina,especiallyforthosewhohaslittleopportunitytojumpoutofthelingualenvironmentoftheirmother-tongue.MOOCwouldalsoalterthecandidates’learninghabit,tosomeextent,mostcandidateshavebecomemorecarefullyandbeenstricttothemselveswiththeinfluenceofMOOC.Onthecontrary,thetraditionalteachingmethodappearingasaruleabidedbymostcollegesanduniversitieswouldmakemostcollegestudentslosetheirconfidenceandinitiativeforfurtherstudy,tireofcopingwithlotsofexaminations.Althoughitishardtobeenseenfromthebarchart,thetendencyofimprovedcompetencyhasinclinedtowardsthesideofMOOC,combiningtheanalysisresultsfromEpisode4.2.5.Conclusion5.1SimilaritiesBetweenMOOCandTraditionalTeachinginApplicationWecaninferfromtheprecedingpartsthatMOOChasmanysimilaritieswiththetraditionalteachingpatterninoperationprocessandconditionsofachievement.Forexample,teachingpracticeismadeupbyteacher’spreparationsbeforeclassandthecommentsandactivitiesofstudents.OperationprocessofMOOChasalreadyinheritedthetraditionalteachingpatterns.ButonlyMOOChaschangedthetraditionalcoursesandturnedintoavirtualclassroomthatcancontainmassivelearnersontheInternet.Thetransfercannotonlygetoverthecontradictionbetweentheincreasingnumberofstudentsandthedeficiencyofsuperioreducationalsources,butalsoacceleratethecommunicationofsuperioreducationalsourcesamongdifferentareas.5.2DifferencesBetweenMOOCandTraditionalTeachingMethodinApplication5.2.1TeachingTargetXuJicunandZhaoChangmuexplainthateverymentorintraditionalteachingpatternmayhaveanticipatedatthestartofanewsemesterthatafullyunderstoodmindwouldbelongto1/3students,another1/3studentswouldgainafloporscrapeapassandthefinal1/3canonlygraspwhattheyhavelearntwhoarenotconsideredasexcellentstudents.Supporthasbeenprovidedtotheseexpectationsfromseriesofgeneralandspecificpoliciesdeterminedbyeducationdepartment.Withsuchaninstructionalobjective,itmusthavetheresultliketheguidance–excellent,generalandbadstudentswhorespectivelytakeup1/3.Itisthepredeterminedteachingaim
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 廣東郵電職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《生物醫(yī)藥與新材料化工科研創(chuàng)新訓(xùn)練》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 江蘇電子信息職業(yè)學(xué)院《人工智能與市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷前沿》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 河南工業(yè)和信息化職業(yè)學(xué)院《生物試驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)與統(tǒng)計(jì)分析》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 撫州職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《管理信息系統(tǒng)課程設(shè)計(jì)》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 中央司法警官學(xué)院《近代物理實(shí)驗(yàn)(1)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 廣西科技大學(xué)《國(guó)學(xué)基礎(chǔ)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 西安建筑科技大學(xué)華清學(xué)院《建筑與房地產(chǎn)法》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 云南國(guó)土資源職業(yè)學(xué)院《幼兒園教育環(huán)境創(chuàng)設(shè)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 海南省文昌市2024-2025學(xué)年八年級(jí)上學(xué)期期末考試物理試題(原卷版+解析版)
- 2025年幼兒園后勤人員個(gè)人工作總結(jié)范文兩篇
- DB37-T 4383-2021 混凝土結(jié)構(gòu)硅烷浸漬技術(shù)規(guī)程
- 甘肅省平?jīng)鍪懈骺h區(qū)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)行政村村莊村名明細(xì)及行政區(qū)劃代碼
- 2022年大夢(mèng)杯福建省初中數(shù)學(xué)競(jìng)賽試題參考答案及評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- 邊坡開挖施工要求
- 數(shù)字圖像處理-6第六章圖像去噪課件
- 部編版六年級(jí)下冊(cè)語文教案(全冊(cè))
- 2022年湖北成人學(xué)士學(xué)位英語真題及答案
- 附表1:網(wǎng)絡(luò)及信息安全自查表
- 公共場(chǎng)所健康證體檢表
- 普通高等學(xué)校獨(dú)立學(xué)院教育工作合格評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系(第六稿)
- 多維閱讀第13級(jí)—A Stolen Baby 小猩猩被偷走了
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論