課件Elsevier期刊投稿

1、Elsevier期刊投稿Agenda出版流程投稿平臺(tái)稿件評審科技論文寫作概要2Pre-SubmissionPeer ReviewProduc-tionPublicationPost PublicationAutomaticHandoverEarly web presencePrepare your articleELSEVIEREditorial-ProductionFully citablepaper出版流程以Elsevier為例Online Submission EES3出版流程編輯部/編輯檢查稿件的學(xué)科方向邀請23位審稿專家審稿專家評估稿件學(xué)術(shù)質(zhì)量給出審稿意見編輯部/編輯 依據(jù)審稿專家意

2、見接收退修或退稿作者投遞稿件至編輯部4Elsevier期刊投稿平臺(tái)Elsevier Editorial System (EES)，集在線投稿、評審和編輯功能于一體的電子平臺(tái)。 EES 支持:作者在線投稿并追蹤稿件狀態(tài)投稿步驟操作指南編輯部/編輯在線邀請審稿專家審稿專家在線審稿編輯部管理稿件信息詳細(xì)數(shù)據(jù)報(bào)告無需安裝，即可使用。5投稿開始選擇期刊6Submit an article選擇期刊: ScienceDirect / Elsevier網(wǎng)站搜索期刊基本信息7期刊主頁 & 作者指南作者指南在線投稿編輯/編委會(huì)學(xué)科范圍8期刊EES主頁 作者指南在線客服期刊簡介9初次使用需注冊/登陸用戶名和密碼會(huì)自

3、動(dòng)發(fā)送至注冊郵箱忘記用戶名密碼點(diǎn)擊“Send Username/Password”10作者主頁投遞新稿投稿步驟11追蹤稿件狀態(tài)追蹤稿件狀態(tài)12稿件是如何被評審的?同行評審?fù)性u審的專家同時(shí)也是期刊的作者和讀者您可以推薦備選的評審專家您的文章一般會(huì)交給2名評審人員評審專家對您來說是匿名的編輯和評審專家會(huì)確保您稿件內(nèi)容不外泄評審過程嚴(yán)格參照Guide for Authors13How to write a scientific article?科技論文寫作概要14文題作者摘要關(guān)鍵詞正文 (IMRAD)IntroductionMethodsResultsAnd Discussion (Conclus

4、ions)致謝參考文獻(xiàn)補(bǔ)充材料（Supporting material）論文常見結(jié)構(gòu)每一部分具體如何寫？如何與評審專家溝通？15寫作的依據(jù)/評審的依據(jù)Guide for Authors！ 16Title, Author and Affiliation文題：簡潔、清楚、充分地表達(dá)文章內(nèi)容，避免無意義的詞作者：唯一標(biāo)識(shí)（統(tǒng)一性），無職位信息，指明通訊作者確認(rèn)所有作者都對文章作出了貢獻(xiàn)，并同意發(fā)表文章作者排序：第一作者是對數(shù)據(jù)收集和分析以及論文撰寫負(fù)有主要責(zé)任的人最后一位作者，通常是有學(xué)術(shù)地位的研究人員，對整個(gè)研究負(fù)有責(zé)任；位列中間者的順序則視其對研究所做出的貢獻(xiàn)而定通訊作者的排名是不重要的，但一旦

5、選擇成為了通訊作者，就要對這篇文章在審閱過程中的所有通信交流質(zhì)詢做出負(fù)責(zé)的回應(yīng)。作者機(jī)構(gòu)：所有作者的機(jī)構(gòu)信息17Abstract簡要介紹文章內(nèi)容和研究目的關(guān)鍵結(jié)論的簡要描述不要涉及太多的實(shí)驗(yàn)細(xì)節(jié)不超過250字論文的縮微模型：做了什么，得到了哪些重要結(jié)果18Abstract 舉例 Abstract. We tackle the general linear instantaneous model (possibly underdetermined and noisy) where we model the source prior with a Student t distribution. T

6、he conjugate-exponential characterisation of the t distribution as an infinite mixture of scaled Gaussians enables us to do efficient inference. We study two well-known inference methods, Gibbs sampler and variational Bayes for Bayesian source separation. We derive both techniques as local message p

7、assing algorithms to highlight their algorithmic similarities and to contrast their different convergence characteristics and computational requirements. Our simulation results suggest that typical posterior distributions in source separation have multiple local maxima. Therefore we propose a hybrid

8、 approach where we explore the state space with a Gibbs sampler and then switch to a deterministic algorithm. This approach seems to be able to combine the speed of the variational approach with the robustness of the Gibbs sampler. 主要發(fā)現(xiàn)是什么做了什么IDMR19KeywordsGuide for Authors!(數(shù)量、分類、關(guān)鍵詞表、特殊要求)不要選擇范圍太大

9、的詞正文里不會(huì)出現(xiàn)的詞，不要用作關(guān)鍵詞若使用縮寫詞，必須是業(yè)內(nèi)公認(rèn)的，例如：DNA(生命科學(xué)), FFT(信號處理), SEM(材料工程), 等。20Introduction簡短，重點(diǎn)突出論述問題、研究目的及研究方法，但不要說明結(jié)論、展開討論或進(jìn)行總結(jié)（應(yīng)包含在Abstract中）引用對應(yīng)領(lǐng)域重要的及最新的著作（30篇以內(nèi)）研究的重要性What is the problem?Are there any existing solutions?Which is the best?What is its main limitation?What do you hope to achieve?評審人員

10、評審角度有效性、論述清楚、內(nèi)容組織相關(guān)重要的文獻(xiàn)是否包含21注意：二次引用在正文部分：Jones (2004, p.22) endorses this controversial view, quoting Johnsons conclusion that the earlier records have been forged. 在參考文獻(xiàn)部分：Jones, P.R. (2004) Golden legends: Christian hagiographies in early medieval Europe. London: Farrar.22Methods基本原則：提供足夠的信息，以便讀

11、者能夠重復(fù)試驗(yàn)或推倒的過程。如果之前已經(jīng)有文章進(jìn)行過詳細(xì)論述，則可以略過，但要進(jìn)行簡要的介紹和總結(jié)，并說清參數(shù)和條件。描述準(zhǔn)確，不用形容詞避免評述和討論以過去時(shí)態(tài)描述23Results首先寫明研究目的，然后是實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)論。對結(jié)果的準(zhǔn)確度、精確度等進(jìn)行說明。必要時(shí)用圖表說明和展示關(guān)鍵結(jié)果。用文字描述簡單的結(jié)論，減少文章空白。只需列出具有代表性的結(jié)果，即對討論和結(jié)論具有意義的結(jié)果，其他結(jié)果可以放在Supporting Materials里。使用副標(biāo)題，使結(jié)果部分具有條理，便于審稿人和讀者閱讀。24研究數(shù)據(jù)絕不能弄虛作假!Fabrication is making up data or results,

12、 and recording or reporting them. Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, processes; or changing / omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. G.C.Lichtenberg (1742 - 1799) “The most dangerous of all falsehoods is a sligh

13、tly distorted truth.” 25Discussion研究結(jié)果與最初提出的問題、引言部分提出的研究目的有何聯(lián)系？通過討論部分的分析能得出你的結(jié)論嗎？是否對每個(gè)結(jié)果都做了闡釋？研究結(jié)果和前人的報(bào)道是否一致？如果有所不同，是什么原因？研究（設(shè)計(jì)）存在何種缺陷或局限性？避免使用“Novel”, “first time”, “first ever”, 這些是留給他人進(jìn)行評價(jià)的確保論述客觀公正26與前人的研究結(jié)果相比較，分析異同 we showed that HR212 could inhibit NDV-mediated cell fusion. This was in contrast

14、 to the results of others16, which. As a further characterization, we detected the inhibition of HR212 added This result implied that the conformational changes of the F protein occurred very quickly after receptor binding to the HN protein This may explain why the inhibition activity was much lower

15、 if added after cleavage activation. However, all these results are still consistent with the idea that HR2 peptides could interact 27Conclusions清楚的結(jié)論有助于編輯和審稿人評判您的論文通常包含對某一研究課題的貢獻(xiàn)實(shí)用意義與擴(kuò)展下一步研究設(shè)想盡量避免總結(jié)文章（Abstract）就影響做出評判28In conclusion, our results obtained with mice increase the knowledge on CPF-indu

16、ced adverse effects, up to now limited to rats. They seem to suggest that not all the CPF effects measured in rats and the related doses can be directly extrapolated to mice, which seem to be more susceptible at least to acute treatment. Even though many questions still remain open, our findings sho

17、w that the mouse could be considered a suitable experimental model for future studies on the toxic action of organophosphorus pesticides focused on mechanisms, long term and age-related effects. Conclusions舉例29Acknowledgement表示感謝的機(jī)會(huì):研究和撰寫論文過程中幫助過你的人，包括技術(shù)上的幫助以及修改文字等?；鹳Y助者所從屬的研究項(xiàng)目審稿人和編輯 (再修的文章)需要做的是：若

18、要在致謝中提到某人的名字必須求得其認(rèn)可。闡明感謝的原因. 注明基金資助編號30Reference，Tables，F(xiàn)igures參考文獻(xiàn)是否準(zhǔn)確參考文獻(xiàn)的數(shù)量參考文獻(xiàn)著錄格式，信息是否完整圖表數(shù)量、質(zhì)量、位置、格式 Guide for authors！31文題作者摘要關(guān)鍵詞正文 (IMRAD)IntroductionMethodsResultsAnd Discussion (Conclusions)致謝參考文獻(xiàn)補(bǔ)充材料（Supporting material）便于編輯和讀者查閱!(informative, attractive, effective)各司其職總結(jié)32反復(fù)閱讀“Guide for

19、Authors”! 33審稿后的修改: 絕好的學(xué)習(xí)機(jī)會(huì)! 要珍惜這個(gè)直接與同行探討問題的機(jī)會(huì)。對于審稿意見要給予充分的回應(yīng)。 在每一條審稿意見下面寫出您的看法或回應(yīng)。不要漏掉任何一條。特別注明已經(jīng)做出的修改(如果有的話)。標(biāo)明頁碼和序號。常見的問題 探討了許多問題，但是最終也沒說清到底做了哪些修改。 對于您接受的意見給以專業(yè)的回應(yīng)。對于您不接受的，要有理有據(jù)地說明你不贊同的理由，力圖說服對方，同時(shí)要保持應(yīng)有的尊重和禮貌。34一個(gè)例子 “ Reviewers Comments: It would also be good to acknowledge that geographic routin

20、g as you describe it is not a complete routing solution for wireless networks, except for applications that address a region rather than a particular node. Routing between nodes requires further machinery, which detracts from the benefits of geographic routing, and which I dont believe you have made

21、 practical. Authors reply: We agree and will add an appropriate caveat. Note that for data-centric storage (name-based exact-match and range queries for sensed events), the storage and query processing mechanisms natively address packets geographically-without a node-to-location database. Reviewers

22、Comments: The footnotes are driving me crazy! Authors reply: Well strive to remove some of them. ” Dr. Ramesh Govindan, professor, Computer Science Department, University of Southern California 35一個(gè)提出反對意見的例子Reviewer #4 clearly didnt read my paper carefully enough. Either that or this reviewer doesnt

23、 know anything about the field! How should I respond during the rebuttal period?Please dont say: If reviewer #4 had just taken the time to read my paper carefully, she would have realized that our algorithm was rotation invariant. Instead say: Unfortunately, Section #4 must not have been as clear as we had hoped because Reviewer #4 didnt understand that our algorithm was rotation in