《Starwood國際酒店管理集團銷售人員招聘甄選標準》_第1頁
《Starwood國際酒店管理集團銷售人員招聘甄選標準》_第2頁
《Starwood國際酒店管理集團銷售人員招聘甄選標準》_第3頁
《Starwood國際酒店管理集團銷售人員招聘甄選標準》_第4頁
《Starwood國際酒店管理集團銷售人員招聘甄選標準》_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩51頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、Sales Selection ToolsDevelopment & Implementation OverviewUpdated: June 23, 2006Implementation Partners:Organizational CapabilityGlobal SalesGlobal HRContentsOverviewTool Development & Study ResultsProcess ImpactTool UtilizationImplementation NotesAppendixOverviewReduce the Time Spent Evaluating Can

2、didatesIncrease the Number of Strong Sales Candidates=Candidate “ProfitabilityHired the best of the best and the new hires were well worth the time spentOverarching Goal:Maximize the Selection Process Selection Process Pre-Implementation (Screening Discussion, B.I.)Improve Sales Hiring ProcessEvalua

3、tion Pre-Implementation Fundamental attributesDifficult to teach or trainAre related to job performanceCan be assessedImprove Sales Hiring ProcessModel World-Class EvaluationSelection Process Pre-Implementation (Screening Discussion, B.I.)+BenefitImpactBetter CandidatesEliminate candidates likely to

4、 be poor performersMore TimeSpend more time on stronger candidatesIncreased ConfidenceUnderstand a candidates experience and abilitiesHire for attitude, train for skillGreater ProductivityStronger candidates make bigger contributions, soonerReturn on InvestmentThe tools are designed to providePhased

5、 ApproachAreaResearch StudyTool ConstructionImplementationSellerLeaderPhase 1 Native EnglishNADApril 2005Seller - Phase 1 AllLeader - Phase 1 AllJuly 2005Australia, FijiSeptember 2005UK, IrelandOctober 2005Phase 2 Additional 8 languagesAPDNov - Dec. 2005Seller APDLeader - Phase 2 AllJuly 2006*EAME S

6、eller EAMEJuly 2006LADSeller LADJuly 2006Sales Selection Initiative:Global FocusBahasa (Indonesian)Chinese (Simplified)FrenchGermanItalianJapaneseSpanish (European)Spanish (Latin American)Phase 2 Languages:* Japan, Korea, India/Bangladesh targeted for October 2006Tool DevelopmentStudy ResultsUnderst

7、andGlobal JobsAug. Dec. 2004Tool Development OverviewSales Incumbents Job Analysis Questionnaire Global SME Focus Groups Job consistencies and career pathsSales Competency Model DevelopmentTool Development:Job Families and Sample TitlesSeller(number of participants per study)Sales Leader(number of p

8、articipants per study)APD: 205EAME: 212LAD: 99NAD: 390APD: 40EAME: 59LAD: 21NAD: 180Account DirectorAccount ExecutiveAccount ManagerAssistant Sales ManagerBanquet ManagerBTSMBusiness Development ExecutiveCatering ExecutiveCatering Sales/Services ManagerSenior Catering Sales ManagerConvention Manager

9、CCS ManagerDeputy Director of SalesEvents Sales ManagerGlobal Account DirectorGlobal Account ExecutiveGlobal Account ManagerGroup Sales/Events Sales ManagerLTSMOne-CallSales ExecutiveSales ManagerSenior Sales ManagerAssistant Director of SalesAssistant Director of Convention SalesAssociate Director

10、Global SalesDirector of Banquet & ConventionDirector of CateringDirector of Catering/Convention ServicesDirector of Event ManagementDirector of Global Sales Director Global SalesDirector of Group SalesDirector of SalesDirector of Sales & MarketingUnderstandGlobal JobsDevelopDraft ToolsAug. Dec. 2004

11、Jan. March 2005Tool Development OverviewePredix library Tried and true questions for predicting sales performanceFocus Groups Assessment question review and writingQuestion TypeDescriptionSuccessful CompetenciesSituational JudgmentWhat would you do in this situation?Time ManagementCustomer ServiceGe

12、neral ManagementPersonalityAttributes not taught or trainedRelationship BuildingDrive for SuccessSelf-ConfidenceCreativityPast ExperiencePreferences/StyleExperienceAspirationsProblem SolvingReasoning skillsAnalysisInferenceDevelop Draft ToolsContent All Multiple Choice QuestionsUnderstandGlobal Jobs

13、DevelopDraft ToolsCompleteToolsRate JobPerformanceTest Many ModulesAug. Dec. 2004Jan. March 2005Phase 1: April 05Phase 2: Nov/Dec. 05(Current sales associates)(Supervisors of sales associates)Tool Development OverviewUnderstandGlobal JobsDevelopDraft ToolsCompleteToolsRate JobPerformanceTest Many Mo

14、dulesFind Best CombinationAug. Dec. 2004Jan. March 2005Phase 1: April 05Phase 2: Nov/Dec. 05May 05Mar/Apr 06(Current sales associates)(Supervisors of sales associates)Tool Development OverviewAnalyses per Phase and DivisionData Results OverviewPresented for current associates (participants)(Bottom T

15、hird)X(Interview Qualified Top two-thirds)* Combined Failed Prescreen and Failed Proctored AssessmentData Results OverviewPresented for current associates (participants)(Bottom Third)X(Interview Qualified Top two-thirds)* Combined Failed Prescreen and Failed Proctored AssessmentGroup of current asso

16、ciatesin study who wouldnot have passedData Results OverviewPresented for current associates (participants)(Bottom Third)X(Interview Qualified Top two-thirds)* Combined Failed Prescreen and Failed Proctored AssessmentGroup of current associatesin study who would have passed; split up into high and l

17、ow passData Results OverviewPresented for current associates (participants)(Bottom Third)X(Interview Qualified Top two-thirds)* Combined Failed Prescreen and Failed Proctored AssessmentGroup of current associatesin study who scored the highestData Results OverviewPresented for current associates (pa

18、rticipants)(Bottom Third)X(Interview Qualified Top two-thirds)* Combined Failed Prescreen and Failed Proctored AssessmentMeasure of job performance (average for group)Development Study ResultsAll Sellers Combined (n=906)Bottom Scorers on Tools(Bottom Third would be filtered out by Tools)XHighest Sco

19、rers on Tools(Top Third of Passing Scores)Passing Scorers on Tools(Bottom two-thirds of Passing Scores)Performance on the tools strongly predicts performance on the jobDevelopment Study ResultsAll Sales Leaders Combined (n=290)Bottom Scorers on Tools(Bottom Third would be filtered out by Tools)XHigh

20、est Scorers on Tools(Top Third of Passing Scores)Passing Scorers on Tools(Bottom two-thirds of Passing Scores)Performance on the tools strongly predicts performance on the jobPredictive: Higher tool performance = greater job performance (e.g., Percent to Goal, supervisor performance ratings)Stable:

21、Consistent relationshipsUnbiased: Legally defensible Key Findings SummarySee Appendix for Detailed Study Results for Each Phase/DivisionResulting ToolsSellerSales LeaderOnline Assessment (Seller)15 to 20 minutesTaken at home, library, internet caf, etc.Proctored Assessment (Seller)40 to 60 minutesCo

22、mpleted on propertyProctored Assessment (Leader)40 to 60 minutesCompleted on propertySeller tools were developed specifically for each Division/PhaseOne Leader tool was developed for all of each Phase combinedResulting ToolsSellerSales LeaderOnline Assessment (Seller)15 to 20 minutesNot taken onsite

23、Proctored Assessment (Seller)40 to 60 minutesCompleted on propertyProctored Assessment (Leader)40 to 60 minutesCompleted on propertyAPD Online AssessmentEAME Online AssessmentLAD Online AssessmentPHASE 1 Online AssessmentAPD Proctored AssessmentEAME Proctored AssessmentLAD Proctored AssessmentPHASE

24、1 Proctored AssessmentPhase 1 Leader Proctored AssessmentPhase 2 Leader Proctored AssessmentSeller tools were developed specifically for each divisionOne Leader tool was developed for all of Phase 2 combinedProcess ImpactWorld-Class Hiring ProcessFiltering out the bottom candidatesWorld-Class Hiring

25、 ProcessFiltering out the bottom candidatesProcessStep1. SourceRecruitment: Meet Basic QualificationsWorld-Class Hiring ProcessFiltering out the bottom candidatesProcessStep1. SourceOnline AssessmentRecruitment: Meet Basic Qualifications2. AssessSellers onlyWorld-Class Hiring ProcessFiltering out th

26、e bottom candidatesProcessStep1. SourceOnline AssessmentRecruitment: Meet Basic QualificationsScreening Discussion2. AssessWorld-Class Hiring ProcessFiltering out the bottom candidatesProcessStep1. SourceOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentRecruitment: Meet Basic QualificationsScreening Discussion2

27、. AssessTools are expected to filter out the bottom 30% candidatesWorld-Class Hiring ProcessFiltering out the bottom candidatesProcessStep1. SourceOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentBehavioral InterviewRecruitment: Meet Basic QualificationsScreening Discussion2. AssessWorld-Class Hiring ProcessFil

28、tering out the bottom candidatesProcessStep1. Source3. FillHire &OrientationOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentBehavioral InterviewRecruitment: Meet Basic QualificationsScreening Discussion2. AssessActivityImmediate Roll OutStarFinder (2007)SourceJob RequisitionContinue as now doneCreate and appro

29、ve requisition onlinePost JobContinue as now doneSet up job profile in ePredix systemPost all jobs through systemAssessment tool URLs will automatically be preparedRecruit & QualifyDHRs, DOSMs, GMs - Broaden candidate search Process ImpactActivityImmediate Roll OutStarFinder (2007)AssessApplication

30、ReviewContinue as now done to Evaluate basic qualificationsStore applicationsBasic qualifications determined onlineOnline interface/ application warehouseOnline Assessment(Seller only)Email qualified candidates with URLSystem directs candidate to online assessmentScreening DiscussionContinue as now

31、done; invite candidates to property Utilize online assessment results to prioritize candidatesProcess ImpactActivityImmediate Roll OutStarFinder (2007)AssessProctored AssessmentPrepare computer and assessment spaceReview resultsDetermine candidate next stepsPass (): Proceed to Behavioral Interview s

32、tepFiltered (X ): No longer an eligible sales candidateStandard “thanks but no thanks/not a fit” languageOptional/courtesy interviewExploratory discussion regarding fit outside sales(Internal) Development discussion; 6 month retest policyBehavioral InterviewContinue as now doneFillHire & Orientation

33、Continue as now done Process ImpactTool UtilizationTool UtilizationDesired PositionSellerSales LeaderExternal Candidate*Any PositionOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentLeader Proctored Assessment* Any candidate from a Starwood franchised property would be considered an external candidateTool Utiliz

34、ationDesired PositionSellerSales LeaderExternal Candidate*Any PositionOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentLeader Proctored AssessmentInternal CandidateNon-SellerOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentLeader Proctored Assessment* Any candidate from a Starwood franchised property would be considered an

35、 external candidateTool UtilizationDesired PositionSellerSales LeaderExternal Candidate*Any PositionOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentLeader Proctored AssessmentInternal CandidateNon-SellerOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentLeader Proctored AssessmentSellerNot required to use new assessment too

36、lsLeader Proctored Assessment* Any candidate from a Starwood franchised property would be considered an external candidateTool UtilizationDesired PositionSellerSales LeaderExternal Candidate*Any PositionOnline AssessmentProctored AssessmentLeader Proctored AssessmentInternal CandidateNon-SellerOnlin

37、e AssessmentProctored AssessmentLeader Proctored AssessmentSellerNot required to use new assessment toolsLeader Proctored AssessmentSales LeaderNot required to use new assessment tools* Any candidate from a Starwood franchised property would be considered an external candidateParameterPolicy NoteMan

38、datoryUse for all Seller and Sales Leader positionsX =Seller Online AssessmentSeller Proctored AssessmentLeader Proctored Assessment6-month retest policyWeb-basedOnline administration only (no paper versions)No longer an eligible candidateUtilization ParametersImplementation NotesKey RolesStrategic

39、Partnership between HR and SalesChampion and sustain tool usageMaintain a smooth process and volume flowScore interpretation filter and prioritizeSupport other properties as neededSetting Expectations“As part of our hiring process, we ask all candidates to complete an assessment that has been shown

40、to be a strong predictor of success for this job.Assessment EnvironmentProctored Assessment GuidelinesQuiet, well-lit space with no interruptionsWorkstation with Internet accessCalculator A way for the candidate to quickly contact someone e.g., technical problems, emergency, etc.NOTE: Seller candida

41、tes are expected to complete the online assessmenton their own (e.g., home, library, internet caf, etc.)English Language NotesSystems training delivered to HR ChampionsSelf-guided training materials for property HR (voice and print)Reference materials (presentations, FAQs, technical documentation)eP

42、redix HelpDesk support (voice and )Administrators website/management of candidate poolHelpDesk GuidancehelpdeskUS: 888-401-2236Outside US: +1-612-843-1067BrusselsNew YorkSingapore3:00 pm9:00 am9:00 pm1:30 am (next day)7:30 pm7:30 am (next day)Internet problems are most commonly a local Internet issu

43、e, NOT an ePredix system problemMost Common HelpDesk Questions:Wrong URL/typosForgotten usernames/passwords; need to reset access codesSupport InfrastructureSupport SourceSupport ReferenceReference DocumentationTraining presentationsFAQs Area/Regional HR ChampionsStrategyProcedural guidanceTriage of technical problemsPhase 1 Divisional Champions (Experienced System User)User experienceSituational questio

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論