版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
CommitteeofSponsoringOrganizationsoftheTreadwayCommissionEnterpriseRiskManagementIntegratingwithStrategyandPerformanceFrequentlyAskedQuestionsJune2017EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingwithStrategyandPerformanceFrequentlyAskedQuestionsEnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingwithStrategyandPerformanceFrequentlyAskedQuestionsPAGEPAGE1TOC\o"1-1"\h\z\uProjectBackground 2ProjectGovernance 3AdditionalInformationabouttheDocuments 3UpdatestotheDocument 5KeyChanges 5EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingwithStrategyandPerformanceFrequentlyAskedQuestionsEnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingwithStrategyandPerformanceFrequentlyAskedQuestionsPAGEPAGE8ProjectBackgroundWhyupdatethe2004EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratedFramework?InOctober2014,theCommitteeofSponsoringOrganizationsoftheTreadwayCommission(COSO)announcedaprojecttoreviewandupdatethe2004EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratedFramework(OriginalFramework).TheOriginalFrameworkiswidelyacceptedandusedbymanagementandboardstoenhanceanorganization’sabilitytomanageuncertaintyandtoconsiderhowmuchrisktoacceptastheystrivetoincreasestakeholdervalue.Since2004,thecomplexityofriskhaschanged,significantnewriskshaveemerged,andboardshaveenhancedtheirawarenessandoversightofriskmanagementwhileaskingforimprovedriskreporting.UpdatestotheOriginalFrameworkreflectcurrentandevolvingconceptsandapplicationsofenterpriseriskmanagement,sothatorganizationsworldwidecanattainbettervaluefromenterpriseriskmanagement.Specifically,itprovidesgreaterinsightintostrategyandtheroleofenterpriseriskmanagementinthesettingandexecutionofstrategy,enhancesthealignmentbetweenorganizationalperformanceandenterpriseriskmanagement,andaccommodatesexpectationsforgovernanceandoversight.Whatdocumentsarebeingupdated?The2004EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratedFramework:ExecutiveSummaryandOriginalFrameworkbothupdated.TheUpdatedDocumentistitledEnterpriseRiskManagement–StrategyandPerformance.ThisUpdatedDocumentconsistsoftwosections.Thefirstsectionoffersaperspectiveoncurrentandevolvingconceptsandapplicationsofenterpriseriskmanagement.Thesecondsectionofthedocument,theFramework,accommodatesdifferentviewpointsandorganizationalstructures,andenhancestheconsiderationofriskintheselectionandexecutionofstrategiesanddecision-making.Withthisupdatedstructure,thenewdocumentisreferredtoastheUpdatedDocument.Arethereanydocumentsfrom2004notbeingupdated?Yes,thevolumeofApplicationTechniqueswhichprovidedillustrationsoftechniquesusedatvariouslevelsofanorganizationinapplyingenterpriseriskmanagementcomponentsnotupdatedaspartofthisproject.WhatapproachisCOSOusingtoupdatetheoriginalFramework?TheProjectTeam,withCOSOBoardoversight,hascarefullyconsiderthemeritsoffeedbackandopinionsthroughouttheproject.Todoso,thePwCProjectTeamreviewedandembracedinputthathelpsinthedevelopmentofarelevant,logical,andinternallyconsistentdocumentinallphasesoftheproject.Thesephasesinclude:AssessandEnvision–Throughreviews,globalsurveys,publicroundtables,andforums,thisphaseidentifiedcurrentchallengesfororganizationsimplementingenterpriseriskmanagement.Duringthisphase,PwCanalyzedinformation,reviewedvarioussourcesofinput,andidentifiedcriticalissuesandconcerns.COSOlaunchedaglobalsurvey,availabletothegeneralpublic,forprovidinginputontheoriginalFramework,solicitingalmost900responses.andDesign–PwC,withCOSOBoardoversight,developedtheUpdatedDocument,whichwasreviewedbytheCOSOAdvisoryCouncilandObserverstogatherreactionsandsuggestions.Exposure–WithassistanceprovidedbytheAdvisoryCouncilandoversightoftheCOSOBoard,PwCpreparedexposuredraftsandanon-linequestionnairetofacilitateareviewbythegeneralpublic.AsummaryofpublicexposurefeedbackisnotedintheAppendicesvolume.Finalization–PwCanalyzedallcommentsreceivedandrefinedthedocumentsforneededmodifications.TheCOSOBoardconsideredwhethertheUpdatedDocumentissound,logical,andusefultomanagemententitiesalltypesandsizes.PwCfinalizedtheUpdatedDocumentandprovidetheupdatetotheCOSOforreviewandacceptance.ProjectGovernanceWhoisCOSO?TheCommitteeofSponsoringOrganizationsoftheTreadwayCommission(COSO)isajointinitiativeoffiveprivatesectororganizations:TheAmericanAccountingAssociation(AAA),theAmericanInstituteofCertifiedPublicAccountants(AICPA),FinancialExecutivesInternational(FEI),theInstituteofInternalAuditors(IIA),andtheInstituteofManagementAccountants(IMA).COSOprovidesthoughtleadershipthroughthedevelopmentofframeworksandguidanceonenterpriseriskmanagement,internalcontrolandfrauddeterrence.WhoisinvolvedwiththeFrameworkupdate?PwCservedastheauthorandprojectleaderforupdatingthepublication,preparedrelateddocuments,andreportedtotheCOSOBoardofDirectors.ThePwCProjectTeamincludedseniorresources,manywhomwereinvolvedinpreviousCOSOprojects,whobroughtin-depthunderstandingoftheoriginalFrameworkandtherationalefordecisionsmadeincreatingtheUpdatedDocument,aswellasadditionalseniorresourcesthatprovidecurrentmarketperspectives.Tocaptureviewsofabroadrangeofprofessionalsinthemarketplace,COSOformedanAdvisoryCouncilrepresentingindustrypractitioners,academia,governmentagencies,andnon-profitorganizations.Towhatextentareregulatorsandotheroversightbodiesinvolvedinthisinitiative?TheU.S.FederalDepositInsuranceCorporation(FDIC),U.S.GovernmentAccountabilityOffice(GAO),InternationalFederationofAccountants(IFAC),InformationSystemsAudit&ControlsAssociation(ISACA),andtheRiskManagementSociety(RIMS)havesentobserverstoattendtheAdvisoryCouncilmeetingsandprovideinputtotheproject.AdditionalInformationabouttheDocumentsIsadoptionoftheFrameworkmandatory?No,theCOSOBoardacknowledgesthattherearemanydifferingregulatory,stakeholder,andindustryrequirementsrelatingtoenterpriseriskmanagement.Assuch,itisincumbentonmanagementtodetermineifandhowtoadoptEnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingStrategyandPerformancetoenhancetheentity’sabilitytocreate,sustain,andrealizevalue.Hastheupdatebeenwrittenforaspecificregulationorregulatorybody?No,theCOSOBoardbelievestherearedifferingregulatoryandstakeholderexpectationsrelatingtoenterpriseriskmanagementanddirectedtheOriginalFramework’sprinciplesbeapplicabletoallentitiesregardlessofstatutes,regulation,andstandards.HowdoestheUpdatedFrameworkrelatetoCOSO's2013InternalControl–IntegratedFramework?InternalcontrolispositionedwithintheUpdatedDocumentasafundamentalaspectofenterpriseriskmanagement.ThetwoCOSOdocumentscomplementeachother,withneithersupersedingtheother.Theupdateddocumentwillfocusonrequisiteareasthatgobeyondinternalcontrol;however,theInternalControl–IntegratedFrameworkremainsaviableandsuitableframeworkfordesigning,implementing,andconductingandassessingtheeffectivenessofinternalcontrolandforreporting,asrequiredinsomejurisdictions.CanIstillusethe2004EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratedFramework?Yes.SincetheadoptionoftheUpdatedDocumentisnotmandatory,managementmaycontinuetoutilizetheOriginalFramework.However,COSOreservestherighttosupersedeorretirethe2004EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratedFrameworkinthefuture.WhatentitiesisEnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingwithStrategyandPerformanceapplicableto?TheEnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingStrategyandPerformanceprinciplesapplytoallentities,includingnot-for-profitandgovernmentalbodies,regardlessofsize.Whilesomesmallandmid-sizeentitiesmayimplementtheprinciplesofenterpriseriskmanagementdifferentlythanlargeentities,theyremainapplicabletoeverytypeofentity.WhoistheintendedaudiencefortheUpdatedDocument?EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingStrategyandPerformancewasdraftedforadiverseaudiencedependingontheirenterpriseriskmanagementrolesandresponsibilities.TheExecutiveSummarywasdraftedforaboardlevelandexecutivemanagementaudiencewiththeintentofsummarizingtheimportanceandbenefitsofenterpriseriskmanagement.Specifically,ithighlightsgovernanceandoversightroleoftheboardasitrelatestoenterpriseriskmanagement.ItalsoprovidesasynopsisofthecomponentsandprinciplesoftheOriginalFramework.TheOriginalFrameworkisintendedtohelpriskpractitioners,businessleaders,andassuranceprovidersbyofferingacomprehensivediscussionofthecomponentsandprinciplesoftheFrameworkfromstrategysettingthroughtoexecution.Thesearesupportedbydetailedappendicesprovidingadditionalexamplesandinsightsintothedevelopingandmaintainingenterpriseriskmanagementpracticesthatarefitforpurpose.UpdatestotheDocumentWhychangethetitle?Thenewtitle-EnterpriseRiskManagement–IntegratingStrategyandPerformance,recognizestheimportanceoftheconnectionbetweenstrategyandentityperformancewithenterpriseriskmanagement.Whereisthe“COSOcube”?The“COSOcube”graphicisstillbeingutilizedintheCOSOInternalControl–IntegratedFramework.Inordertobetterillustratethealignmentofrisk,strategy,andperformanceEnterpriseRiskManagement–StrategyandPerformanceintroducesanewgraphics.Wasthedocumentmadeavailableforfeedbackpriortobeingfinalized?SimilartopreviousCOSOFrameworkupdates,thedraftFrameworkwasmadeavailableforpubliccommentpriortofinalization.Thepubliccommentperiodwasasignificantphaseoftheproject,intendedtogarnerglobalawarenessandengagementaswellassolicitdirectfeedbackonthedocumentduringthedraftingprocess.ThepubliccommentperiodwasheldforthreemonthsbetweenJuneandSeptember2016.Membersofthepublicwereinvitedtoreadthedocumentsandeithersubmitcommentlettersorcompleteashortonlinesurvey.Commentlettersreceivedduringtheperiodwerepostedonforthedurationofthepubliccommentperiodand90daysthereafter.Followingtheconclusionofthepubliccommentperiod,everycommentreceivedwascataloguedandevaluatedbythePwCProjectTeam.Duringpubliccomment,thedraftFrameworkwasdownloadedapproximately10,000timeswith46%ofdownloadsoccurringoutsideofNorthAmerica.Commentsreceivedaddressedallaspectsofthedocumentwithnoentitytype(public,private,notforprofit)orindustrygroupdominatingthefeedback.AsummaryofthefeedbackisprovidedinAppendixBofVolume2.KeyChangesTheUpdatedDocumentincorporatessignificantchangestoreflecttheevolutionofenterpriseriskmanagementthinkingandpractices,andtoprovideadditionalclarityonconceptsintroducedin2004.Someofthemostsignificantchangesareoutlinedbelow.Pleasenotethatthechangeshavenotbeenlistedinanypriorityorder.TheUpdatedDocument:AdoptsacomponentsandprinciplesstructureSimplifiesthedefinitionofenterpriseriskmanagementEmphasizestherelationshipbetweenriskandvalueRenewsthefocusontheintegrationofenterpriseriskmanagementExaminestheroleofcultureElevatesdiscussionofstrategyEnhancesthealignmentbetweenperformanceandenterpriseriskmanagementLinksenterpriseriskmanagementintodecision-makingmoreexplicitlyDelineatesbetweenenterpriseriskmanagementandinternalcontrolRefinesriskappetiteandtoleranceTheseareeachreviewedbelow.AdoptsastructureofcomponentsandprinciplesSimilartootherCOSOframeworks,theUpdatedDocumenthasbeenstructuredusingcomponentsandprinciples.ThefiveinterrelatedFrameworkcomponentsaresupportedbytwentythatcoverrangingfromandculture,strategyandobjective-setting,performance,reviewandrevision,andinformation,communication,andreporting.Eachoftherepresentafundamentalconceptassociatedwithacomponent,areuniversalintheirapplication,andformpartofenterpriseriskmanagement.TheFramework’sprincipalgraphicoutlinestherelationshipbetweenthecomponentsandprinciplesandservesasanavigationaltoolthroughoutthedocument.Thegraphicisusedtoenhancethedocument’sreadability,usability,andcreatesacohesivenessacrosstheFramework.SimplifiesthedefinitionofenterpriseriskmanagementThedefinitionofenterpriseriskmanagementintheUpdatedDocumentwasrevisedtomakeitmorememorableandreadable.FeedbackfromthesurveyconductedintheAssessandEnvisionphasesuggestedthatwhilethe2004versionwasrelativelyeasyforthoseinriskmanagementrolestounderstand,itsclaritywaslessevidenttothoseoutsideofariskfunction.Revisingthedefinitionisintendedtoimproveclarityforallusers.Therevisedversionrequiresthatthereaderconsiderthefulldefinitionofspecificwordsusedinthedefinition.Forinstance,thedefinitionofrisktiestotheachievementofstrategyandobjectives.Whilethedefinitionofenterpriseriskmanagementdoesnotdirectlyreferencestrategyandobjectives,itisincorporatedthroughthedefinitionofrisk.Lastly,theupdateddefinitionmorecloselyalignsrisktovalue,whichisnotedasakeydriverofenterpriseriskmanagement.EmphasizestherelationshipbetweenriskandvalueInrefiningthedefinitionofriskandelevatingthediscussionsofstrategyandperformance,theUpdatedDocumentemphasizestheroleofenterpriseriskmanagementincreating,preservingandrealizingvalue.Enterpriseriskmanagementisnolongerfocusedprincipallyonpreventingtheerosionofvalueandminimizingrisktoanacceptablelevel.Rather,itisviewedasintegraltostrategysettingandtheidentificationofopportunitiestocreateandmaintainvalue.Insteadofsimplyfocusingonreducingrisktoatargetstate,enterpriseriskmanagementbecomesadynamicandintegralpartofthemanaginganentitythroughoutthevaluechain.RenewsthefocusontheintegrationofenterpriseriskmanagementTheintegrationofenterpriseriskmanagementintoallaspectsofanorganization’soperationsishighlightedthroughouttheUpdatedDocument.Startingwiththeintegrationofenterpriseriskmanagementintothestrategy-settingprocess,thesettingofbusinessobjectives,andmanagingriskinexecution,theconsiderationofriskisnotpositionedasanadditionalorseparateactivity.Rather,theimportanceandroleofenterpriseriskmanagementispresentedthroughthelensofsupportinganorganization’soperations,managingperformanceandultimatelycreating,realizingandpreservingvalue.Asanexample,theUpdatedDocumentdoesnotrefertoriskreportingbutinsteadonthereportingofpotentialoractualmanifestationsofriskimpactingperformanceandtheachievementofstrategyandbusinessobjectives.ThisUpdatedDocumentencouragesuserstoconsiderenterpriseriskmanagementaspartofthemanagementofanorganizationasopposedtoadistinctorsiloedactivity.ExaminestheroleofcultureThesignificanceofculture’sinfluenceonenterpriseriskmanagementpracticesisoneofthefirstconceptsintroducedwithintheUpdatedDocument.TheimportanceofunderstandingandshapingthecultureisexploredinthecontextofriskgovernanceandoversightoftheentityandhowitinfluencesothercomponentsoftheFramework.Forexample,therelationshipbetweencultureandbusinesscontextisestablishedattheoutsetoftheFramework.Thisrelationshipinfluenceshowstrategiesarechosenandexecuted.Moreimportantly,itprovidesthecontextfortheidentificationandassessmentofrisksandtheallocationofresourcesinrespondingtothoserisks.ElevatesdiscussionofstrategyTheUpdatedDocumentrecognizesthatsomeofthemostsignificantorganizationalfailuresinrecenttimeshaveoccurredwhenastrategyisselectedthatdoesnotaligntothemission,visionandcorevaluesofanentity.Further,ifthatthatalignmentisestablished,manyorganizationsstilldonotunderstandtheimplicationsofaselectedstrategyontheirriskprofile.Moreover,manyorganizationsaresimplycaughtunawarewhenseeminglyminorfailuresatanoperationallevelescalateinmagnitudeandthreatenthelongtermviabilityofanentity.TheUpdatedDocumentelevatesandexpandsthediscussionofstrategyandriskestablishedin2004byfocusingonthefollowingthreeconcepts:Thepossibilityofstrategyandbusinessobjectivesnotaligningwithmission,visionandvalues;Theimplicationsfromthestrategychosen;andRisktoexecutingthestrategy.Bydistinguishingthethreepotentialmanifestationsofriskimpactingstrategy,theUpdatedDocumentprovidesforamoredetailedanalysisandrecognitionoftheroleandimportanceofenterpriseriskmanagement.Theconceptsareexaminedprogressivelythroughoutthedocument,exploringtheconsiderationsfortheidentification,assessmentandmanagementofriskandtheimpacttostrategyforeach.EnhancesthealignmentbetweenperformanceandenterpriseriskmanagementAsindicatedbyitsnewtitle,theUpdatedDocumentenhancestherelationshipbetweenriskandperformance.Itfocusesonhowriskisintegraltotheestablishmentofbusinessobjectives,andperformancetargetsthroughthefollowing:TheUpdatedDocumentexploreshowenterpriseriskmanagementpracticessupporttheidentificationandassessmentofrisksthatmayimpactperformance.Bydeterminingtheacceptabletolerance,UpdatedDocumentusersareabletounderstandhowchangesinperformancemayleadtochangesintheriskofabusinessobjectiveandversa.TheUpdatedDocumentemphasizesthatriskassessmentsandriskreportingarenotintendedtogeneratelongofpotentialrisks,butratherhighlightshowrisksmayimpacttheachievementofstrategyandbusinessobjectives.Tohighlighttheimportanceofthisrelationship,theUpdatedDocumentintroducesanewgraphicaldepictionreferredtoasariskprofile.Theriskprofilesdemonstratehowthetypeandseverityofriskcanchangeinresponsetochangesinthelevelofperformanceforagivenstrategyorbusinessobjective.Thedepictionalsotakesintoaccounttheentity’sriskappetiteandhelpsidentifywhereanorganizationmaybeassumingexcessiveriskorbeabletopursuefurtheropportunities.Byincorporatingtheconceptsofriskappetite,performance,andriskintoasinglegraphic,theriskprofilesofferadynamicandcomprehensiveviewofriskandenablemorerisk-awaredecisionmaking.Linksenterpriseriskmanagementintodecision-makingmoreexplicitlyAllorganizationsrecognizethatdecision-makingoccursateverystageofthevaluechain.Asentitiesseektocreate,realizeandpreservevalue,decisionsaremadearoundtheselectionofstrategy,theestablishmentofbusinessobjectivesandperformancetargets,andtheallocationofresources.Integratingenterpriseriskmanagementintothelifecycleofanentitysupportsrisk-awaredecision-making.TheUpdatedDocumentprogressivelyexploreshowinformationgatheredabouttheorganizat
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 【高效備課】北師大版九(上) 第2章 一元二次方程 4 用因式分解法求解一元二次方程 教案
- 肩軸倒立(教案) 體育五至六年級(jí)
- 信息技術(shù)二年級(jí)下冊(cè)人教版(一、二年級(jí)起點(diǎn))15 綜合實(shí)踐活動(dòng) 教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)
- 2023-2024學(xué)年 滬教版(全國(guó))九年級(jí)化學(xué)上冊(cè) 第4章 認(rèn)識(shí)化學(xué)變化 第1節(jié) 常見的化學(xué)反應(yīng)-燃燒 教案
- 華東師大版第二冊(cè)信息技術(shù) 4.1網(wǎng)站的創(chuàng)建 教案
- 安徽省滁州市民辦高中2024-2025學(xué)年高三年級(jí)下學(xué)期十月份月考化學(xué)試題含解析
- 《金銀首飾手工制作服務(wù)規(guī)程》征求意見稿
- 人教版七年級(jí)數(shù)學(xué)上冊(cè)教案(全集)含教學(xué)反思教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)說課稿
- 承包土方工程協(xié)議書
- 財(cái)務(wù)個(gè)人的六月份工作總結(jié)(3篇)
- 2024陜西西安市自來水限公司招聘119人高頻500題難、易錯(cuò)點(diǎn)模擬試題附帶答案詳解
- 國(guó)家能源集團(tuán)國(guó)神公司招聘筆試題庫2024
- 超長(zhǎng)期特別國(guó)債項(xiàng)目
- 房地產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目開發(fā)工程師招聘筆試題及解答(某大型國(guó)企)
- 2022年湖北荊州中考滿分作文《從一次有意義的對(duì)話說起》3
- 4《田家四季歌》第一課時(shí)(教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì))2024-2025學(xué)年統(tǒng)編版語文二年級(jí)上冊(cè)
- 課件:七年級(jí)道德與法治上冊(cè)(統(tǒng)編版2024)-【新教材解讀】義務(wù)教育教材內(nèi)容解讀課件
- 公司食品配送項(xiàng)目 投標(biāo)方案(技術(shù)標(biāo) )
- 中考英語語法復(fù)習(xí)過去進(jìn)行時(shí)課件
- 第5課 用發(fā)展的觀點(diǎn)看問題-【中職專用】2024年中職思想政治《哲學(xué)與人生》金牌課件(高教版2023·基礎(chǔ)模塊)
- 水池環(huán)氧樹脂防腐施工方法
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論